[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

I have had the exact opposite experience for the most part, but sometimes hurt people hurt people and older people can carry a lot of pain from life.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 7 hours ago

As a long time Zelda fan I never understood any of the hate for BOTW from other long time fans. That being said I haven't been able to play it since TOTK came out because TOTK is what BOTW was missing for me.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

That is why it is in quotes. Maybe try taking in the whole thought and think it over before dropping your mic because I call them coincidences as well.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

It is obviously a coincidence, hence why "Prophetic dreams" is in quotes. At no point have I claimed it wasn't mere chance. Stop picking fights for no reason.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

With enough volume…

You mean like over 8.2 billion people, having an average of about 4 dreams per night over 365 days?

-6
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Personally I would never get an automated tattoo, as you said the risk of serious harm is way too high, and I also prefer to keep art in the realm of Humans. I think eventually we will realize that automation isn't the answer for everything, but it is interesting that someone thought this was a good idea.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Since we are going a little off topic, do you know what is interesting about the West vs East rhetoric?

It can be traced back to Ancient Greeks and the Persian wars. The Greeks saw the Persian invaders as the "Barbarians from the East" and themselves as the "Democratic West", and because Greek written language dominated at the time the rhetoric took quite the hold and is still a part of our rhetoric today.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago

If they cheat, it's over. No exceptions.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

It is pretty well established that the levels that they have enriched their uranium is above that deemed for "civilian use". They have a highly scrutinized nuclear program, and we have a lot of information available to us about it.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

In my home province a Tribe recently codified their own constitution. The surrounding tribes have already contested their claim to some of the lands the Tribe in question has claimed as their own.

I think the big question before we can talk about where we draw the line for "resistance" is how far back in history are we going to go to declare the "rightful" owners of land, and who gets to decide where the borders are after?

Maybe it is time our species finally acted as a whole instead of continuing to pretend we all aren't the exact same, and work to make the lands we all share today habitable for everyone.

-25
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

EDIT: Thanks to a helpful comment I see why I was wrong.

38
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
30
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
32
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
9
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The article itself is important because it is fucked up that BCUP kept taking donations long after they dropped out and the election was over, but it had a very interesting piece of information about the election overall that is buried in it.

Between Aug. 29 and Dec. 31, the B.C. Conservatives took in just under $3.93 million from 4,534 contributions, while the NDP received just over $3.93 million from 7,439 contributions.

Provincial political contributions in B.C. are capped at about $1,484 in 2025, up from just over $1,450 last year.

It is interesting that with the same limits, and about the same dollar amount donated, the BC conservatives hit $3.93 million with about 3,000 less donors.

Speaks volumes.

-2
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

The question that I have not seen asked is why are these guns being destroyed?

I may be ignorant to some reason why it is not possible, but wouldn't the best idea be to buy back all of these weapons for use in the military?

I hear our military could use millions of guns and parts, and it would actually justify the cost of the program. It would also be a massive increase on military spending our allies have been asking for and that we are in serious need of.

6
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
9
submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
15
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
9
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
2
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: next ›

Arkouda

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 1 year ago