32
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

The power of friendship (I have no friends)

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

I Believe in the Power of American Native

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

I'm nitpicky about the word "believe". So let me rephrase: I do not believe. Either I know, or I don't know. Everything else are more or less informed speculations, assumptions or hypotheses at best.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

It took me longer than I’d like to think of an answer.

Maths.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

These are some more lighthearted things, but here goes:

• Sonic the Hedgehog ( Sonic '06 ) wouldn't be as fun of a game if all the bugs and glitches were gone. I live for a good glitch or six sometimes. Same without the highly difficult and janky super speed sections.

• Sonic Unleashed is an amazing game ( but the xbox/ps3 versions are the superior versions, as someone who has beat it on ps2 and xbox360 ).

• Due to the janky turn left/right movements on Sonic Lost World and just general movement jank, I am absolutely glad they have the run button to occasionally slow me down and stop me from dying.

• Also an extreme believer that the special stages ( on the 3DS version of Lost World ) are absolute cancer.

• Wallace and Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl was nowhere near as good as The Wrong Trousers. I absolutely hated how they made Wallace absolutely incompetent and idiotic when it comes to normal things ( like how to use a non-electric tea pot ) when he didn't have any technology.

• Xbox style controllers with BAXY ( right, down, left, up ) button layout are the way to go. The only exception to that belief right now is my 3rd party wired switch controller because it has a headphone jack.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

The world is made of magic, it just differentiated into so many forms, that one of them is science and that's what many people believe is all there is.

I feel in the mood to explain more about this:

Similar to european school's history classes tend to be focused on european history (we call that "eurocentrism"), our worldview is focused on humans, i think that's called "anthropocentrism". While humans are important, it's not everything there is. There's also plants and other living beings, and in fact there's many more of them than of us. I try to consider that.

I'm calling the unity of all life "magic", i came up with that and it's supposed to be a play-on-words on the german word "Magen" (stomach) (representing that plants and animals are connected through an important relationship that is food). Also the stomach is the organ most physiologically/spatially central in the human body, in my opinion. So i imagine that everything's in the human is built around that "central" organ that is the stomach. That makes sense as the intake of food is the root of all animal existence, that enables animal's existence in the first place. Thus "everything is created from the stomach outwards", as supportive organs to help the stomach collect and digest food.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

Everything is objective. Our ability to quantity things is where we consider things to be subjective.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

I was talking about this with a coworker recently and I don't believe they are.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 23 hours ago

I believe in social democracy, I believe that it is the best political ideology.

It combines a free society with a government provided safety net.

I see communism as being too restrictive, and unregulated capitalism as being way too out of control.

A progressive social democratic country with a strong government seems to me as combining new ideas with a stable foundation.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

We believe in nothing, Mr. Lebowski.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Nothing.

And tomorrow we come back and we cut off your chonson.

[-] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Does anybody love anybody anyway?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Don't hurt me!

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

Just listen to the rhythm of my heart!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

No one needs more than 500sqft of living space per capital until poverty is eradicated

War is absurd and the consequence of greed and senile, old, fucked up and immoral men

Democracy doesn't work without a limit on speech - specifically hate speech, authoritarianism, and ethnic superiority ideology

Fascism is the greatest concern of the western world right now

Genocide deserves instant disavowal and should convince any sane person to immediately support removing any government official or politician from office who doesn't oppose it

Black Lives Matter, and American history has treated black Americans awfully (see prison industrial complex)

Housing isn't an investment vehicle. Tax speculative purchasing of housing. Support government building high density housing like the HBD system in Singapore or Austria's housing system

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

So 1000sqft for a couple, 1500 for a family of 3?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

That seems pretty reasonable, though I'm not sure it really scales linearly. My wife and I live in appx. 1000sqft, and that's really plenty for us. An extra 500sqft seems about right when we have a kid, but another 500 for each additional kid would be excessive.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

I gave it as an upper bound.

E.g. 3500sqft for a 3-5 person family is way too large.

Mansions are basically an immoral amount of waste/greed (in the realm of >1000sqft per person, or super rich person mansions in the realm of 10,000sqft per person)

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Only that which has evidence to support it.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Free will is an illusion.

Either as Hard determinism (60% confidence in this theory), or as in some form of Quantum randomness (40% confidence in this theory), you cannot just willy nilly pick something. Its just an algorithm, and, possibly, a little bit of randomness, if Quantum randomness is true.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

I always understand "free will" to mean "figure out who you really are". I.e., every person has a certain character from birth, and that just unfolds throughout life. "Free will" is about figuring that out.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

A good cup of coffee and the universe does not care about existence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Believing in something seems to imply thinking something to be true without having evidence for it - otherwise it would be knowledge, a justified true belief. So I know a couple things, like that I exist as a conscious being, and have practical empirical knowledge of the rest of the sensory world too.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

What you just uttered is a totally valid belief in my eyes :)

Beliefs don't always have to be based on mere intuition alone. It's totally fine to be able to back up what one believes with arguments.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago

have practical empirical knowledge of the rest of the sensory world too.

Oho, that's a pretty bold statement of belief for someone who can't prove they're not a brain in a vat!

More seriously though, there are tons of things that have conflicting evidence or are simply too big or complex to have enough evidence to have definitive proof for, yet we still have to make decisions about them. Like believing that X vs Y is a better governing system (eg democracy vs republic). Or what about questions that aren't related to proof, like defining and living by ethical standards? Yet most people still find value in "moral" things, and believe that people should do "good" instead of "bad".

[-] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

A theory I’ve been working on lately is that our worldview rests on certain foundational beliefs - beliefs that can’t be objectively proven or disproven. We don’t arrive at them through reason alone but end up adopting the one that feels intuitively true to us, almost as if it chooses us rather than the other way around. One example is the belief in whether or not a god exists. That question sits at the root of a person’s worldview, and everything else tends to flow logically from it. You can’t meaningfully claim to believe in God and then live as if He doesn’t exist - the structure has to be internally consistent.

That’s why I find it mostly futile to argue about downstream issues like abortion with someone whose core belief system is fundamentally different. It’s like chipping away at the chimney when the foundation is what really holds everything up. If the foundation shifts, the rest tends to collapse on its own.

So in other words: even if we agree on the facts, we may still arrive at different conclusions because of our beliefs. When it comes to knowledge, there’s only one thing I see as undeniably true - and you probably agree with me on this: my consciousness, the fact of subjective experience. Everything else is up for debate - and I truly mean everything.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago

Maybe a god's existence is a core belief for some people, but it shouldn't be. There shouldn't be anything you believe without a logical reason to.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

“Why is there something rather than nothing?” is a valid question - and the idea that something created it isn’t entirely unthinkable. The point is that you can’t prove or disprove it. Not believing in God is just as much a foundational belief as believing in one. Much of what you think about the world is built on these core beliefs - the kind that, if proven wrong, would effectively collapse your entire worldview.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

What i don't get here is what the existence of a "creator" would have to do with abortion. Just as an example, what if there is a god. What does that tell us about everyday life, or about abortion?

It would be very well conceivable to me that there is a god, but they have no opinion about whether we do abortions or not. How are these things connected?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

In the case of being anti-abortion, we’re talking about people who believe in the biblical God - and they often point to chapters in the Bible to justify their stance. In most cases, it boils down to the belief that life begins at the moment of conception and that all life is sacred. There are also passages in the Bible that speak about God having plans for unborn children.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

Ok, let's take a step backwards. How are you defining 'god'?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

Personally, I consider it synonymous with “creator,” but even if someone believes in a biblical God, that’s beside the point. While the idea of a biblical God is an entirely unconvincing concept to me, I still give it - or something like it - a greater-than-zero chance of actually existing. I can’t prove otherwise.

Another example of a belief like that would be belief in the physical world around you. You could be dreaming - or in a simulation.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

So can I clarify that when you're saying

Some people take the existence of god as a brute fact

That you mean

Some people assume that universe was created by something

?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

Well, that’s not a direct quote from me, but yes - some people assume the universe was created by something. For some, that’s the person running the simulation; for others, it’s the biblical God as described in the Bible, or atleast their interpretation of it.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

So if I'm understanding you correctly it's not just that people believe the universe was created by something, but they have a specific idea of what that thing is - eg a conscious, powerful, morally good, knowledgeable being

[-] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

I don't see how this is relevant to my theory but yeah, sure.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Ok, now I've clarified what beliefs you think some people assume without evidence, I would still say that believing those things isn't right. You should still have a good reason for believing what you believe, and taking the existence of a conscious creator as given is invalid.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

By "those things," you're referring to God or the entity running the simulation? Whether it's a reasonable belief isn’t really relevant from the perspective of the theory itself. You’re still going to encounter people who hold such beliefs - and if you want to change their minds, the better approach is to identify and challenge their underlying beliefs, rather than the ones built on top of them.

Belief in a God or a creator is a foundational belief - being against abortion isn’t. That view only logically follows from the prior belief.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

Someone can have a fundamental belief that they shouldn't have.

Someone can also have a derivative belief from another derivative belief, without the prior belief having to be fundamental.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Whether they should or shouldn’t hold those beliefs is not an objective fact but a value judgment on your part - and either way, it’s entirely unrelated to what I was saying.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
32 points (94.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

31896 readers
1860 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS