[-] reader@hexbear.net 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

redirect it to https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Wikipedia

Edit: someone already snatched it but no redirect yet

[-] reader@hexbear.net 1 points 1 day ago

Of course, but that has nothing to do with your prediction that I took issue with. I'm not saying this shit isn't dystopian and going to get worse or that age verification isn't going to be a part of that, but the specific childish predictions of "operating systems add age verification that literally is just asking the user what their age is and just send it willy nilly to cloud services -> government outlaws lying about your age -> services log ages and IPs -> the government gets that info and uses that to track down and prosecute people with the exact maximum age".

The reason there's generalized harassment of oppressed groups and not of digital pirates (or age liars) is 1) because pigs don't actually care about digital piracy that much, its not baked-in to settler society in the way that white supremacy, patriarchy, etc. are, and 2) because pigs can't really see it. 2 could change, we could get the watch dogs future world where everyone is facial recognition-ed at all times and that's linked back to their digital footprint to such a granular level of detail that random beat cops can see that you pirated a movie last night or that you signed up to facebook with a false name/age. But even if that changes, point #1 will not change on its own, changing the law doesn't suddenly make cops or the legal system at large give a shit to enforce it, it'll just get used as another way of harassing the marginalized people they already wanted to harass.

[-] reader@hexbear.net 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

A the-pigs can't see on your face that you lied about your age when you installed ubuntu 9 months ago, but they can identify members of those groups and single them out for harassment, culminating in disproportionate prosecution for minor offenses. These things are not comparable. A better comparison would be digital piracy.

This is a ridiculous hill to die on, idk why I'm even replying

[-] reader@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago

Yeah this is really cool tbh. It seems (napkin math) in this case the power generation is only at most like half the capacity needed to desalinate the amount of water that plant processes (100kW output capacity vs 55 m^3 of water at ~5 kWh/m3 = 278 kW) but even that is a pretty major game changer and if it can scale like you're saying....

[-] reader@hexbear.net 10 points 4 days ago

honestly my only familiarity is from excerpts in Liberalism: A counter-history by losurdo and it didn't seem too appealing but it may kind of be an interesting historical perspective on the USA far before its hegemony

[-] reader@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

In terms of power generation its not a ton. 100kw capacity?

But I think the idea is that it's performing 2 functions that already needed to happen, and getting power as a byproduct. The two functions being: diluting desalination brine back down to normal levels for discharge, and discharging treated wastewater (this is the key that the article doesn't make very clear, but this one lays it out better: "In Fukuoka’s system, a generator is attached to a local desalination plant located near a sewage treatment facility. It draws in highly saline wastewater from the desalination plant and receives treated sewage.".

Plus it's a proof of concept/research facility for larger scale implementations elsewhere (gulf states maybe?)

I didn't realize there were parts of japan so dry that they needed desalination to have reliable water supply so I was also initially confused tbh.

[-] reader@hexbear.net 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

CW: (fictitious) sexual assault

US Army medical reports later indicated that Lynch had been removedd during the first three hours of her captivity, while she was unconscious.[21] The authorized biography, I Am A Soldier Too: The Jessica Lynch Story, by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Rick Bragg describes Lynch as being sodomized during captivity,[22] although the Iraqi doctors who rescued and treated her denied that they had found evidence of sexual assault.[23][24][25]

Аlthough articles, citing medical records and the nature of Lynch’s injuries,[26][27] claim that Lynch wasremovedd while in captivity, Lynch herself says that she does not remember any sexual assault. She was categorically against mentioning the removed in the book, but Rick Bragg insisted, arguing that "people need to know what can happen to female soldiers in war."[28]

how the consent manufacturing machine works in a nutshell (with a little misogyny thrown in for good measure). Official reports get filled with propagandistic projection, her own biographer is practically salivating over getting to put salacious details in, and the fact that both she and her captors deny it ever happened is a footnote.

[-] reader@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago

Its hard to know what the shape of things to come will be.

If the shocks are just higher food prices due to higher diesel prices... That's a tough situation honestly because I don't see it opening up a lot of cracks in the existing food system. Stockpiling now is a good idea but will only carry you so far and you don't necessarily have a lot of resources to do so, by the sound of it?

If the shocks are more severe, with genuine shortages or breakdowns in parts of the distribution system, there may be opportunities that open up to provide your own transport or labor in collecting food from farms or other points in the supply chain yourself that commercial operators can't or won't bother with due to the cost or low availability of diesel. That would still require some of the hard work of building connections, but a crisis situation would make that easier in some ways. Volunteers with electric vehicles could be a real asset here in providing transport that isn't disabled or rationed?

[-] reader@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I'm not assuming good faith lol, those mechanisms just wouldn't be effective, and assuming the government thinks about linux users enough to chase down IP logs of users with a particular fake age is childish, and that's all assuming that the PRs being discussed even do anything of the sort (sending the age stored in the user db to external services willy nilly).

If age verification crap catches on it won't be totally unenforceable mandates like "its illegal to lie about your age" it'll be technological solutions ala DRM and they'll be more effective (but still circumventable with a little expertise probably). And for now, I do expect that the legal mandates will remain on service providers, not individual users. We're simply too much effort to prosecute for meaningless bullshit

[-] reader@hexbear.net 4 points 5 days ago

It's reasonable to assume the next legal step is to outlaw lying about your age. IP logs associated with an age of 126 would be easy targets.

Its really not reasonable to assume either of those things. If shit like this really takes off it'll be less like the linked discussions and more like DRM, with proprietary software (and hardware, if they want it to stick), linked to an online service that "verifies" your age externally.

[-] reader@hexbear.net 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

My interpretation is that Drop Site is trying to offer journalism by tweet. As in they aren't just puttimg out excerpts or headlines from articles, theyre actually interacting with other accts independently of that, but they also arent just retweeting faceless accounts like most unserious "situation monitorer" types. Theyre actually explaining who the quoted person is and why/if what they are saying is credible.

20
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by reader@hexbear.net to c/videos@hexbear.net

I wasn't expecting much but kid's like 60-70% of the way there in ways I didn't see coming.

If this is the level of understanding preppy white kids have I feel pretty good about the prospects for the rest

26
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by reader@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

So, this article seems like uncontroversial fluff, until you get to this part:

The Myth of “Feeding the World”

But the capitalists and their politicians cry, “We need factory farming and industrialized agriculture to “feed the world”!

But this, too, is a capitalist lie. Far from solving hunger, the industrial monoculture model at the heart of factory farming actively exacerbates it. As Vandana Shiva has noted, “industrial agriculture accounts for only 28% of the world’s food production, [but] it is using up 75% of the world’s resources.” Capitalists constantly frame the system as more “efficient,” but here too we see a system of staggering inefficiency. Industrial agriculture’s reliance on vast single crops like corn and soy — a large portion of the global harvest dedicated to livestock feed — causes varying levels of environmental destruction. Industrial agriculture under capitalism “pollutes the environment by increasing the use of inputs, accelerating soil erosion, polluting water resources, raising carbon level in the atmosphere, and decreasing biodiversity.” This model then often drives deforestation to clear land for more monocultures or cattle, further damaging biodiversity and fueling climate change.

I'm on board with the latter section, I think that's clearly true, but is it really the case that industrial agriculture is less than 1/3 of global food supply? Anyone have any idea how that's measured? And where's the line, is it just mechanized farming/mass raising of livestock? It seems like if this stat has any basis in reality it's mostly because of feeding animals for livestock, not because large mechanized farms don't work (though as discussed they have major flaws and downsides)

6
submitted 5 months ago by reader@hexbear.net to c/marxism@hexbear.net
view more: next ›

reader

0 post score
0 comment score
joined 5 months ago