I am 100% with you but I just wonder wtf they think.

In all seriousness, have you ever met a woman who "just" had an abortion? Without any internal struggle? Who "just" made an appointment, walked in, walked out? Not scared of how close it was to an life altering event for the woman? With not difficult feelings to the possible child? "Just" another day in her life?

Anyone?

I just don't believe that those women exist in large numbers but it feels like they think that is what every abortion is.

Ps: his example feels weirdly specific to me.

The problem is the following:

They are primarily classist in the more general sense. They believe that some class of people are above another class of people. E.g. rich above the poor, one race above the other, ...

They are both socio-economic classist and racist.

Because they are both, their racism is trying to use their socio-economic classist ideas to justify their racism. E.g.: they might receive help from social programs but in their mind, they aren't the lower class because the actual lower class of illegal aliens are stealing the jobs and resources that would allow them to take their rightful spot in a higher class. That is why they are concerned about e.g. taxing the rich.

But both because reality is not their fantasy and because they believe that the system is somewhat merit based, they have to explain why these hardworking alliens are not climbing the socio-economic labber... so aliens have to be lazy!

Consequently aliens are stealing the jobs, so the classist falls undeservingly to a lower class BUT they are also lazy to explain the lack of socio-economic growth for those aliens.

Then those classist morons will get together to organise themselves. Obviously one of the leading notion is the lack of class for the members of the movement, as that is how they understand the world. And obviously the people within the movement with a higher socio-economic class have the opportunity to take advantage of their higher class and get power in the movement. If they are a little smart, they will point at the "lowest" class and blame them.

Then we get movements like maga or the afd. Both state openly that they want to harm the lower classes (as they are supposedly lazy/criminal/evil). Obviously the classist, who obviously want to be a higher class, are fundamentally competitive to each other which destablize the movement. Alliances are built on utility. Once the higher class member are in the highest position, loyalty to others doesn't provide added value but loyalty to the leader provides perceived value to the followers. Consequently the movement tries to help the higher classes instead of the lower classes that originally joined to get support to escape the unfair system that prevented them to reach a higher class.

Ofc the higher ones in the movement are classists as well and look at the lower class members as little more valuable than the alliens and consequently they have no real interest in removing the aliens as they are cheaper labor which helps the elite.

And that is why fundamentally racism movements tend to fail to actually do the racism in the way that the racist wants. And instead are primarily performative. And the movement is primarily classist and not racist, the poor racist are no different to the lower races for a rich racist. So the poor racist get fucked over too.

And these racist idiots fall for the same scam again and again and again. They just don't understand that the fundamental ideals of their moment causes them to be fucked over unless they are at the top. Metaphorically speaking, Racists join a MLM and believe they will be rich 1 day.

Edit: I forgot to mention that these movements tend to be tribal and create additional classes like "rino" (Republican in name only), which pushes the movement away from their racist roots towards a more vague classist notion.

AND I HAVE TO STRESS THEY ARE STILL RACIST AND THEY STILL HARM THOSE "RACES". but not in the way, the majority of racist want them to.

I would be on your side but...

He might tried to pay for sex, we don't know. She certainly posted what she posted. We can't judge him as we know nothing. We can judge her for what she said. 2 people can be bad/good people while we only have data on 1 of them.

The reason why some people aren't happy with her post.

I would never hype up a man

Sounds a bit hostile. Like why go on a date with a man when your attitude is kind of hostile even while retelling the positive experience with that man?

Then she "hypes him up" by pointing at the money that he spent on her. Nothing else.

So she doesn't want to hype a man but when he provide her with wealth.

That is what she said.

He might be a incel... who knows. We don't and we don't need to know to judge her.

Weird example but ok.

And no, it is not only historical. I stated that in my original comment and I invite you to look at left wing politics but some "left wing" politician's position on some random issue, but a widely supported position by the left wing community. You will see that they are all in opposition of hierarchy.

But let's take your weirdly racist example, where is the hierarchy?

That a government site can be used so obviously for partisan propaganda is wild.

Can we not make joke about Monica? She got horribly treated by the public while he is the only one who should have been punished.

She is fighting bullying and she is pretty cool for that.

How deep do you need to be in the propaganda to think like that?

So the "tech genius" doesn't know how to install windows without a Microsoft account and doesn't know how to Google it?

May I introduce the man who wants you to think he is a genius!

Thanks Elon for being so transparently incompetent.

"traveling" yikes.

That is one way to say, you think wealth is attractive.

I have traveled quite a bit and I like it a lot, but it is no hobby. For it to be a hobby, I would have to have a lot more money.

Once or even twice a year, is hardly a hobby.

I was 100% pro-choice but somehow this made me more pro-choice. Wtf...