this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2024
959 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

59598 readers
4382 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
959
Court Bans Use of 'AI-Enhanced' Video Evidence Because That's Not How AI Works (gizmodo.com)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
230 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A judge in Washington state has blocked video evidence that’s been “AI-enhanced” from being submitted in a triple murder trial. And that’s a good thing, given the fact that too many people seem to think applying an AI filter can give them access to secret visual data.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's the new "4k". Just buzzwords to get clicks.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (1 children)

My disappointment when I realised "4k" was only 2160p 😔

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

I can't disagree with this... After basing the size off of the vertical pixel count, we're now going to switch to the horizontal count to describe the resolution.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

on the contrary! it's a very old buzzword!

AI should be called machine learning. much better. If i had my way it would be called "fancy curve fitting" henceforth.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Technically speaking AI is any effort on the part of machines to mimic living things. So computer vision for instance. This is distinct from ML and Deep Learning which use historical statistical data to train on and then forecast or simulate.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"machines mimicking living things" does not mean exclusively AI. Many scientific fields are trying to mimic living things.

AI is a very hazy concept imho as it's difficult to even define when a system is intelligent - or when a human is.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

That’s not what I said.

What I typed there is not my opinion.

This the technical, industry distinction between AI and things like ML and Neural networks.

“Mimicking living things” is obviously not exclusive to AI. It is exclusive to AI as compared to ML, for instance.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There is no technical, industry specification for what AI is. It's solely and completely a marketing term. The best thing I've heard is that you know it's ML if the file extension is cpp or py, and you know it's AI if the extension is pdf or ppt.

I don't see how "AI" is mimicking living things while neural networks are, just because neural networks are based on neurons, the living things in your head.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Incorrect. 15 years in the industry here. Good day.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I only have 10 so you win I guess.

At least you are good at debates, I guess.