this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
528 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

37747 readers
678 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I mean canonical also tries to monetize its users. The problem is more shareholders who want profit than the software being proprietary.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Canonical has nothing to do with Arch Linux, so I don't see what's the issue.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

And I don't see why Arch is relevant to the discussion. My point is that software being non-proprietary is not a guarantee for preventing fuckery like Microsoft's. Profit-maximizing companies will maximize their profits, proprietary software or not. Canonical, which sells a non-proprietary Linux distribution, is an example of this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

yeah, ive been meaning to switch, but it doesnt really compare in sheer quantity of little crappy things stacked on top of one another.

i think the main thing though, is that i can switch away from ubuntu and still be on same ol linux. and switching the rare stuff i dont like is as easy as doing it once and never worrying again.