this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
573 points (96.6% liked)

politics

18898 readers
3129 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Damn! You had to go back over 100 years practically to the Whigs!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

as i said, so-called third parties have been with us much longer and have accomplished things modern politicians could never conceive.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

"never conceive"?

Tell me, did a third party pass the Civil Rights Act?

That was pretty inconceivable for the time.

As was legalizing same sex marriage.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

the civil rights act was not the work of the democrats or the republicans. it was the work of dedicated activists and, yes, other parties such as the black panther party. they exerted pressure onto the parties in government, and the parties in government acquiesced.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Welcome to what parties are —coalitions of groups, including activists working under a united banner — in this case, the Democrats.

The Black Panther party wasn't in Congress; they did not vote on it. They are not a "third party," in a governing sense.

But to answer the question directly: Yes, it was the Democrats who both supported and are primarily responsible for its passage.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes, it was the Democrats who both supported and are primarily responsible for its passage.

... in congress. but they would have never proposed it if the writing weren't on the wall, if the people in the streets had not made it a matter of import. giving the democrats credit is like giving bank tellers credit for financing bank robbers' lifestyles.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I'm all for people demanding things in the streets. That's not the same as what you've been suggesting, which is to vote third-party. These two things are two entirely different things.

Black Panthers didn't hold legitimate Congressional power like Democrats. So again, thank Democrats in Congress for passing it. Something you risk spoiling by letting Republicans get into office.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

you’ve been suggesting, which is to vote third-party

https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/9217095

where?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

nethier the civil rights act nor the legalization of same sex marriage is as concrete as a constitutional amendment, which is itself part of the constitution, and determines whether other laws are constitutional.