this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2024
62 points (100.0% liked)

memes

22774 readers
425 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in [email protected], it's a great comm.

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He literally said this, guys!

...

...Literally!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago (12 children)

Honestly I don't get his fixation with defending Stalin specifically. Stalin wasn't the entirety of the USSR, just it's leader at a pivotal moment, and like most leaders he had flaws. If anything defending this one specific person in a leadership role of the USSR is a detriment to the reputation of the institution as a hole, the achievements of the Soviet Union weren't Stalin's alone. It really screams "I just worship a cult of personality" instead of "I'm trying to do an honest defense of a socialist project that has been smeared by most."

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (8 children)

He is the most slanderd one so it makes sense to defend him 95% of anti soviet propaganda is connected to Stalin no even the biggest lib gives a shit about slandering brezhnev or khrushchev

i dont see the obssesion with some weird middle ground between lib that belives everything and crazy tankie

it comes off as the dumb thing leftists do where they say "maybe there is no Uyghur genocide"but there is still some bad things going on"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

it comes off as the dumb thing leftists do where they say "maybe there is no Uyghur genocide"but there is still some bad things going on"

Why is this a dumb thing? If there are actual bad things shouldn't you mention the bad things? Of course it's dumb if you just take the midpoint of western propaganda vs chinese propaganda to do a "both sides" thing but I don't see why you wouldn't mention the bad things if you know for sure they're there.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Because the Person conceding to atrocity propaganda just to look nauced and the worst psrt they arent saying it because they believe it they are saying it because they are scared that saying the latest state department narrtive is 100% bullshit makes them look crazy so they go with this 80/20 bullshit.

You should never ever concede to propaganda against countries to look respectable .

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)