▲ 2150 ▼ "It has to be Chromium" (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by 0Xero0@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 557 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] vreraan@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 years ago (2 children) After the quantum update i switched to firefox, as now in performance it is almost on par with chrome or sometimes better. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] schrodingers_dinger@lemmy.world 11 points 3 years ago (1 child) I remember I switched to chrome way back when chrome was first becoming popular because of its speed compared to Firefox in like 2010 or something. Firefox caught up within a year and I have never missed Chrome for a second. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sheilzy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Oh, I was similar. When Chrome was new I liked it, but it seems to be vulnerable to get these weird superfluous add-ons that I may have acquired through malicious links. When I switched to Firefox I wasn't as suseptible to malware, and the speed was just as good. permalink fedilink source parent [–] topinambour_rex@lemmy.world -4 points 3 years ago (1 child) You mean it uses a bunch more of ram ? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vreraan@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago For me Chrome uses more RAM, plus it's usually some addon that slows down firefox more. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] schrodingers_dinger@lemmy.world 11 points 3 years ago (1 child) I remember I switched to chrome way back when chrome was first becoming popular because of its speed compared to Firefox in like 2010 or something. Firefox caught up within a year and I have never missed Chrome for a second. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sheilzy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Oh, I was similar. When Chrome was new I liked it, but it seems to be vulnerable to get these weird superfluous add-ons that I may have acquired through malicious links. When I switched to Firefox I wasn't as suseptible to malware, and the speed was just as good. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sheilzy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 years ago Oh, I was similar. When Chrome was new I liked it, but it seems to be vulnerable to get these weird superfluous add-ons that I may have acquired through malicious links. When I switched to Firefox I wasn't as suseptible to malware, and the speed was just as good. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] topinambour_rex@lemmy.world -4 points 3 years ago (1 child) You mean it uses a bunch more of ram ? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] vreraan@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago For me Chrome uses more RAM, plus it's usually some addon that slows down firefox more. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vreraan@sh.itjust.works 1 point 3 years ago For me Chrome uses more RAM, plus it's usually some addon that slows down firefox more. permalink fedilink source parent
