this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
642 points (89.4% liked)

General Discussion

12053 readers
199 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


πŸͺ† About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: [email protected]!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


πŸ’¬ Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with β€˜silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to [email protected] or [email protected] communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

So sometimes it's a wealth tax, not necessarily an income tax.

Still, the top 10 billionaires are averaging +$40B/yr. Tap that for 5% and that's $21B.

Here's some things you could afford with that money:

  • 250k people get a free $85k education.
  • 6 million kids get $20/day to eat a quality school lunch for a whole year.
  • 84k homeless people get a $250k house
  • Every teacher gets a $5k bonus

And that's just from 10 people, at 5%, one time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The top 10 billionaires are not increasing their wealth by 40billions a year. So that's wrong.

Why wouldn't they just take all their money out of America and invest in other countries?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well, the tin-foil-hat answer is because they make more by investing it here, namely, in politicians. (Like Musk bought Twitter in an attempt to control the national discourse, so he could, you know, help influence who gets elected and make more money.)

It's probably just more profitable here. We're a Capitalist nation. Capitalists are gonna wanna play our game. If you had a giant stack of bills in Monopoly, you wouldn't take a bunch of them over to the Chutes and Ladders table.

What do all men with power want? More power.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Oh god. Financial illiteracy and misandry this is everything wrong with Lemmy.

There is tax avoidance and multiple other capitalist countries. Wealth tax will be exceptionally difficult to implement for billionaires.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Were all just dreamers. The solution is out there.