General Discussion

12091 readers

2 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.

🪆 About Lemmy World

🧭 Finding Communities

Feel free to ask here or over in: [email protected]!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!

💬 Additional Discussion Focused Communities:

[email protected] - Note this is for more serious discussions.
[email protected] - The opposite of the above, for more laidback chat!
[email protected] - Into video games? Here's a place to discuss them!
[email protected] - Watched a movie and wanna talk to others about it? Here's a place to do so!
[email protected] - Want to talk politics apart from political news? Here's a community for that!

Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.

0. See: Rules for Users.

No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to [email protected] or [email protected] communities.
No Ads/Spamming.
No NSFW content.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

642

Does this plan make sense? v3 (lemmy.world)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

431 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

"We find that countries with legalized prostitution have a statistically significantly larger reported incidence of human trafficking inflows. This holds true regardless of the model we use to estimate the equations and the variables we control for in the analysis. Also, the main finding is not dominated by trafficking to a particular region of the world." SOURCE

This is a study that references many other studies going back decades with data examining differences between 150 countries.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Many thanks.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They found a correlation but didn't factor in any regulation. Correlation does not imply causation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They did actually, they even address this in the study pretty early on and they also find the correlation persists in countries where the humans are being sourced from despite no changes in that nation's regulations. Human trafficking increases from legalized prostitution.

From the article that you didn't read:

This is because contrary to Akee, Bedi, et al.’s (2010) implicit underlying assumption, the legalization of prostitution is not equal to laxer enforcement of anti-trafficking laws and, conversely, the fact that prostitution is illegal does not imply stricter anti-trafficking enforcement. Human trafficking always remains illegal even if prostitution becomes legal. Moreover, by erroneously equating the legal status of prostitution with different levels of law enforcement with respect to human trafficking, Akee, Bedi, et al. (2010) overlook other demand and supply effects that the legalization of prostitution may have on human trafficking.

and

Akee, Bedi, et al. (2010) provide an excellent game-theoretic analysis on the effects of anti-trafficking law enforcement in source and destination countries between such country pairs. However, their analysis tells us nothing about the effect of the legalization of prostitution in itself. This is because contrary to Akee, Bedi, et al.’s (2010) implicit underlying assumption, the legalization of prostitution is not equal to laxer enforcement of anti-trafficking laws and, conversely, the fact that prostitution is illegal does not imply stricter anti-trafficking enforcement. Human trafficking always remains illegal even if prostitution becomes legal. Moreover, by erroneously equating the legal status of prostitution with different levels of law enforcement with respect to human trafficking, Akee, Bedi, et al. (2010) overlook other demand and supply effects that the legalization of prostitution may have on human trafficking. Jakobsson and Kotsadam’s (in press) paper is closer to our theoretical analysis in this regard as they directly focus on the supply and demand effects of legalizing prostitution. However, they only take into account the scale effect, i.e., the expansion of prostitution markets after legalization. As we will show below, there is an opposing substitution effect replacing illegal, forced prostitution with voluntary, legal prostitution, making the overall effect indeterminate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I don't see anything about factoring in regulation. Also, how many instances of human trafficking go unreported? They seem to rely heavily on the idea that all cases of human trafficking are reported. It also seems that they don't consider the fact that human trafficking reporting may indeed be better in countries where prostitution is legal.