this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
231 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37603 readers
519 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago (4 children)

If I’m reading this correctly, they’re adding your name to your site profile, but that’s not visible and is not linked to your reviews.

That specificity makes the situation much less terrifying than the title alone would imply.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 months ago (3 children)

An accidental “bug” or data breach could cause these names to become public. Given today’s atmosphere of “Oopsie daisies” and hacks that happen with upsetting frequency, this is a very real thing to be concerned about.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago

As well as subpoenas from lawsuits / law enforcement.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

The fact alone that they were storing your name in the first place means that was always possible. Frankly, this isn’t anything to be concerned about anymore than being concerned about trusting literally any private business that doesn’t publicly document their data retention practices and also subject themselves to routine audits. You should be concerned about that though by the way. But my advice is to not wait around for it to become obvious.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They weren't storing your name in the first place; they've acquired a new service 'blowfish' for which an account is automatically created for you if you currently or in the past have used glassdoor. Blowfish demands a real name to be used at all. (including to delete your account)

Ontop of this, after linking the two services on your behalf; glassdoor will now automatically populate your real name and any other information they can gleam from blowfish, your resumes, and any other sources they can find, regardless of whether the information is correct (users have reported lots of incorrect changes). This is new.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

One gleans information.

One gleams the cube.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Finger missed the n key... Didn't mean to type gleam

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Lol, i appreciate any chance to reference that weird 80s movie!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’m looking at it from a perspective of intentionality. Careless? Definitely. A risk ? For sure. But the situation is still not as the title implies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It could be hacked, or law enforcement could subpoena the data. Neither are even improbable events nowadays.

Sure, the headline doesn’t quite communicate every possibility or the complete spectrum of dangers, but that’s not the job of a headline. The job of a headline is to get you to click the link.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Risks that are already described.

The headline does it’s job getting clicks by making it sound like reviewers names may already be public.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If they have the information, it can be purchased, leaked, or linked to.

They do not need and should not have this info, especially without consent.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I was thinking about how this would happen and I remembered when signing up for services using Google login, I’d always get a list of information the website would have access to, including the name listed under the Google account. When I didn’t consent to that, I went back.

Now, is there a line somewhere between strictly getting a user’s consent and the user having an expectation of privacy? Yes, and they may have landed on the wrong side of it.

Suffice it to say, this is one of the reasons I prefer to sign up with an email address.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

As is often the case with sensationalist media coverage