you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)

"my wife is rather petite" also supports your view point on the topic.

BUT another way of viewing the topic is that $30 in paper money only has that value because it has it written on it. If you set them both on fire and melt them, copper and nickel maintain a lot more of their value than paper currency.

So really it can be argued either way ¯⁠\_(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Analogies only go so far. Even the best will break down if you stretch it too far.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    I like contactless payment, but these contactless tits aren't for me.

    Do you remember those days when you'd go abroad and have to exchange your tits for the local tits? It was nice trying to collect them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I, for one, would greatly prefer breasts that are acceptable currency at vending machines.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    So richer women would have bigger boobs? And paying for things made them smaller?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Bro you saw the answer. They have the same value despite different sizes. It's simple. Basic. Elementary. 😉

    Joking aside; no I'm totally serious. They should have semi-automated mammogram vending machines that pay people to get tested and they should be as common as the blood pressure kiosks at pharmacies (which should also pay people to use them). The value of catching more treatable diseases earlier in their progression would well outweigh the cost.

  • source
  • parent