this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
320 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19144 readers
5136 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you honestly think this, you’re not paying attention.

I'm aware that there is a lot of discrimination against immigrants, both illegal immigrants and legal immigrants. But, that discrimination isn't caused by referring to them by an accurate term.

What kind of argument is this?

It's a response to the stupid statement "Literally the law they broke is on the same level as jay walking", which is clearly not true.

has a jay walker ever been forced to go back and pick up their litter

What does litter have to do with jay walking. Do you even understand what jay walking is?

different crimes can be at the same level, and still have different punishments

No.... that's what makes the "level" different. A crime that is punished more severely is at a more severe "level" than one that isn't. Come on, this isn't rocket surgery...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Oh lordy.

So the dehumanizing term should be used because it’s not the reason people are dehumanizing the people.

Are you can fan of racial slurs by chance? Because “it’s just an accurate word for black people” is something racists say about certain words as well.

What does litter have to do with jay walking.

What does leaving the country have to do with jay walking?…

I’m simply using your own flawed logic. And you’re proving my point.

How exactly is rectifying the law broken a harsher punishment? How would it make any sense to just charge them a fine and let them be on their way? That’s like saying you should just fine someone littering and then ignore the fact that they are continuing to actively litter.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So the dehumanizing term

It's not a dehumanizing term. That's ridiculous.

What does leaving the country have to do with jay walking?…

Nothing. Is your brain mushy?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Weird, because this was you up the chain a little:

Has anybody ever been removed from a country when they've been caught jay walking?

So which is it?

It's not a dehumanizing term. That's ridiculous.

The majority of the country disagrees.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

So which is it?

It's the same consistent thing: Jaywalking is not punished as severely as illegal immigration, because it's not on the same "level".

The majority of the country disagrees.

Which country, because definitely not the USA.