this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
754 points (98.3% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5747 readers
479 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Don’t know what else to tell you! You could’ve just looked it up!

I did. I also happen to speak multiple romance languages – you know, the ones that are pretty much just Latin with a thick accent. That etymology is bad. Don't trust everything you read on the internet just because it's on the internet.

Also, are you aware that the Romans didn't largely differentiate between cepa and aglio, i.e. onions and garlic-like plants?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I also happen to speak multiple romance languages

Me too! I didn't even say the usual Latin word isn't cepa, in fact one of my sources says that in plain terms. Maybe improve your English reading comprehension since you're so proud of your polyglotism.

Don’t trust everything you read on the internet just because it’s on the internet.

I understand doubting etymonline.com but the OED and Collins Dictionaries are authoritative sources written by lexicographers. You know, people who dedicate their working lives to the meanings and origins of words. Wind your neck in, you arrogant milksop.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

authoritative sources written by lexicographers

Which means jack shit, especially when it comes to an anglophone source. Anglophones can't even decide which sets of symbols represent which phonemes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think you're confusing the reputation of the average anglophone as monolingual with the quite storied reputation of English lexicographers. Your mouth is much bigger than what's behind it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

No, I'm not. Open ten english dictionaries and you'll find ten different schools of thought.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

So if I open ten English dictionaries and they all agree that "onion" comes from the Latin "unionem" via the Old French "oignon", will you promise to stop dying on this hill? Given that I've already shown you three that agree on that very thing? How confident are you feeling? Actually now that I think, you said you'd looked it up but you've nothing yet to show for it, so what's your source?