you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Probably none. The whole bathroom debate has been legally dubious from the outset.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That's weird. They can refuse people using their bathrooms if they don't pay, I figured denying them for other reasons was also on the table.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    How could it be? Are they checking birth certificates?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I mean, they shouldn't even have to check birth certificates.

    What's stopping a business from saying you can't use their restrooms just because they feel like it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Might be part of the requirement for running a business is you have to have a restroom available. When's the last time you were in a restaurant without a bathroom? I'm sure they all don't just supply one because it'd be weird to not, instead it's probably part of the license req.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Well potentially nothing? Until someone says "why?" and then it becomes gender discrimination

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    In the general case, nothing. Not too long ago I was in a Ben & Jerry's that had closed its bathroom down, for example.

    The bartender in question here committed battery; that's the underlying crime, not denying bathroom access. The hate crime rider on top is, by definition, an enhanced penalty for thinking illegal thoughts while committing some other crime.

  • source
  • parent