Measure allows parent to seek child support up to a year after giving birth to retroactively cover pregnancy expenses

The Republican-led Kentucky senate voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday to grant the right to collect child support for fetuses, advancing a bill that garnered bipartisan support despite nationwide fallout from a controversial Alabama decision also advancing “fetal personhood”.

The measure would allow a parent to seek child support up to a year after giving birth to retroactively cover pregnancy expenses. The legislation – Senate Bill 110 – won senate passage on a 36-2 vote with little discussion to advance to the House. Republicans have supermajorities in both chambers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 41 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Just to be devils advocate, while a law like this doesn't seem bad, yay social programs, doesn't it sort of set up more precedent that a child is a child at conception? In turn making it harder to argue for abortion rights based on other existing laws like this one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    Abortion rights are based on the bodily autonomy of the woman, not the status of the fetus.

    Even a fully grown adult cannot use another person's body without consent.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'd say it sets a precedent that a child isn't a child until after birth. They don't want to pay the bill without proof of purchase. Fuck these vermin.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    It sounds like it doesn't take effect until the child is born, so I dont think it itself respects that precedent. But it's a red supermajority state so I'm sure they'll find a way to oppress women with this, even if I do fundamentally agree with the idea that an absent father be on the hook for pregnancy expenses.

  • source
  • parent