you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -34 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Now they do not, as outlined by the supreme court this morning. You can disagree with the ruling all you want, but that doesn't make the premise that "the SC has no problem with insurrectionist behavior!" any less stupid. It's a fallacious premise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Consider the fact that there is more than one grounds for disqualification. For president, there are also age and naturalization disqualifications.

    Who do you think has been determining those all these years?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -33 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    You're getting further and further away from your original, still ridiculous statement that the SCOTUS has no problem with you storming the building.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment