this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
113 points (95.9% liked)

World News

32290 readers
656 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 35 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Reminder that the Red Sea attacks have still resulted in zero casualties. In response, the US-UK has killed 22 fighters.

Disrupting trade is punishable by death.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Attacking civilian ships is generally considered a dick move.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's a gigachad move and the only morally correct thing to do when they're supplying a genocide.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

But they're not just attacking ships supplying aid to Israel. They are attacking whatever passes by them. If it was to support Gaza, why would they have attacked a clearly marked Chinese ship?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

attacked a clearly marked Chinese ship

Pretty sure they stopped attacking Chinese and Russian ships since they stopped supplying "israel" and co. through the Red Sea after the Yemeni gov told them to. There were a few misfires after that but for the most part they're left alone.

Hell, a br*tish ship misqueraded as a Chinese ship a few days ago to avoid being attacked. Probably why Yemen is ending up hitting a few Chinese ships too.

Regardless, China has condemned the US and UK's bombing of Yemen. As anyone with a hint of morals should.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Curious how you logic justifies their attacks on western ships, but not the west's response to these attacks.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah western countries and their ships should probably consider not supplying or supporting the genocide.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And if you don't want to be retaliated against, don't attack ships.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

This idiot would've told Jews in the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising to not attack the nazis if they don't want to be retaliated against.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Curious how you logic justifies their attacks on Yemen, but not the Houthi's response to these attacks.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

Why did they attack those ships?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Red sea attacks... so just leave out the US soldiers killed.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Different group. Turns out, lots of people in that region hate the US!

[–] [email protected] -4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Disrupting trade is punishable by death.

At this scale? Yes. Fucking up global trade at this level hurts people all over the planet. The downstream pain reaches into millions of households.

And if that hurt isn't enough for you, it's clearly terrorism. And your plan is to let it stand because there haven't been any deaths?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Damn those ships and countries should probably consider not supplying a genocide then.

Fucking up global trade at this level hurts people all over the planet

That's from the capitalist class hoarding all the wealth. We have more than enough resources to meet everyone's needs otherwise. Know who to blame and direct your frustration at.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

My plan is to force Israel to stop the genocide.

And they aren't shutting down all global trade. Just ships going to or from Israel. Sanctions, essentially.