-21
If people using Reddit are called Redditors, then what do we call people who use Lemmy?
(discuss.tchncs.de)
this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
-21 points (28.6% liked)
Asklemmy
43782 readers
910 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The "search asklemmy" link that loads my "local" tab in jerboa? Hard to call that "working" imo.
That's a Jerboa problem not an asklemmy problem.
Fair, but "working" is still a condition I put forth as desireble. Whether or not it not working is asklemmy's fault or jerboa's fault, it doesn't "work."
I'm not accusing you personally of sabotaging lemmy, we're all cool here, I'm just saying "a working search function would be a good thing to have inside all communities on lemmy" and I'm not sure why that would be controversial.
From my end, it sounds like you want things that haven't been developed yet and don't like the bandaid solutions that have been added to try and help. There are a ton of things that won't work from the different apps and again, expecting them to makes it sound like you have expectations that just can't be met right now.
Well, what I was actually saying was that feature that hasn't been developed yet would be cool to have.
Are we not allowed to think features that haven't been developed yet would be good to develop? How does developing happen if one is only allowed to think current features would be good? Sure, "we have community search at home," but I can't still want actual McDonald's fries? They are objectively better than orida, "real search" is better than "bandaid solutions," honestly I don't get why there would be pushback against the thought that "we need a real search function," tbh, you make it sound like they're developing it or working on it so obviously someone agrees with me, what're we doing here? Same team dude.
:shrug: It works on my machine - i.e. I tested it on the web ui, not in each individual app.