this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
464 points (97.9% liked)

Games

16742 readers
921 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -5 points 9 months ago (5 children)

This may be an unpopular opinion but as I see it most of D4s microtransactions are fine (still a trash game but that's a different point). They're mostly just cosmetics. They only exist so that people who want to can throw money at the company. If you don't want to buy them then just don't buy them. Like this portal recolor one. Sure it's $30 but it isn't like there is any advantage to buying it. It's not giving you faster warps to town or more xp or anything like that. It's only there for you to throw money at blizzard and have a graphic showing that you threw money at blizzard. If you don't want to throw $30 at blizzard for no gain then don't throw $30 at blizzard for no gain. If a bunch of whales want to throw away their money on cosmetics then let them.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

The dev time spent on garbage micro transactions could be spent on making a good game.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

In addition to that jimquisition that another user commented, remember that its easy to say "it doesnt affect me if i dont buy it" but people do buy it. Some people spend silly money on cosmetics and if people keep dojng that then it encourages game companies to spend less time on making the games good and more time on pumping out cosmetics.

The proof is in tbe pudding. Games are mostly shit now.

These are massive companies whos sole aim is to make money, not entertaining games. They dont care, they will just follow the money.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is mostly a me problem but I get mad at the very idea of someone spending $30 on a skin. That is such a clash with my values it's upsetting.

Like, I don't want to slide all the way down the "why spend any money on fun when people are starving" slope. I understand that people need some joy in their life.

But I just don't see how the skins in these games bring joy anywhere near the money charged for them. Like the title, you could buy a whole other smash hit game for that much money! Plus tons of other non game stuff. That's a small dinner with friends. That's a small band's concert.

So I just get kind of mad that people are spending their money on this stuff at all. It's not a good use of money. Stop it. Be better at money. Reminds me of an old friend's idiot brother that would blow his money on expensive not-bulk soda and candy when he needed a new keyboard. Like literally failing the marshmallow test.

But I can't control other people. Sadly.

That's before any of the "blizzard wants money. They see the huge ROI for this stuff. It's a better ROI than other content. They will make more skins instead of other content" train of thought.

With apologies for this longish rant.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But I just don't see how the skins in these games bring joy anywhere near the money charged for them.

The simple answer is that, for a fair amount of people, $30 isn't a notable purchase, such that it's not particularly a substitute for anything else they may be interested in doing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Is that true? Something like 40% of Americans don't have $400 on hand. Maybe the people spending money on this trend wealthier?

I feel like you'd have to be pretty wealthy for $30 to be unremarkable.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 9 months ago

Maybe the people spending money on this trend wealthier?

I mean we're already looking at a fairly expensive hobby in gaming, which is going to skew towards people with more money in the first place.

And just speaking from my own perspective as solidly middle class, $30 is pretty comfortably within what I can spend without particularly thinking about it. Like yeah, I obviously can't just throw $30 at everything I see, it adds up over time, but it's low enough that I don't particularly have to think about exactly where it will come out of my budget.

And fwiw, I tend to avoid most in-game micro transactions, because I simply don't value them all that highly. I barely even care about getting free unlocks in most games.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

There's a number of reasons that "it's just cosmetic" is bullshit.

  • Developer time and effort is limited. More effort on cosmetics is less time on other things.
  • "free" cosmetics will intentionally be made worse than premium ones to drive conversions.
  • the game loses the ability to reward impressive feats with cosmetics, as that harms sales.
  • a non-zero amount of your time is spent being driven to purchase cosmetics.