Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
We have. Secure the border. Repeal the NFA. Go hard on crime. Voter ID. Parental rights. Outlaw Abortion (Among some of us, we arent a monolith) Outlaw Puberty Blockers (Again, among some). EVs (Among some) Enshrine the right to repair. Hell, even culture war shit, might as well throw in the guys who care way too much about movies and entertainment.
I can go on, but I'm starting to get into the weeds here.
I'm really struggling to comprehend some of these.
"Life sure is tough nowadays. I feel like the American dream is dead and I'm struggling to get by. If only the government could help."
"Don't worry! I hear the government just [removed gun restrictions / made prison sentences longer / gave everyone an ID / outlawed abortion / outlawed puberty blockers / made showing gay things on tv illegal]!"
"Finally! My life is sure to improve for the better!"
You're aware that not everyone shares your point of view, and political opinions about what should be done, right? Because it just seems stupid to cry about a political party you don't support anyway representing what people who disagree with you want the government to be doing.
"What policy do you think would improve people's lives?"
"Make the national anthem death metal"
"Uhh alright that's a weird one. I'm really not seeing how that would improve people's lives"
"Look man, not everyone shares your opinions"
Yeah I get that, but that really doesn't help me understand! I do understand some of the responses. Immigration policy changes? Sure. Not everyone's going to agree on it, but I can see how it can effect the lives of the average person.
How is banning puberty blockers going to improve the life of the average person? No judgement, I really honestly truly don't understand. Everyone has more guns? What improves? I don't get it!
Theres more than just the economy, but securing the border, deporting illegals, and raising tariffs will make things better for American workers. Hard to compete with cheap 3rd world countries.
Hell you could go further and slow down the worker visa programs, although I'm not sure how many agree with me on that.
There's a trade-off you have to make with tariffs.
By raising tariffs, you protect the industry from foreign competition. Sure, workers might have relatively more secure jobs than they would otherwise, but the product of their work is also more expensive and would cost consumers more. Without the tariffs, the industry would be required to produce lower cost goods to compete with foreign counterparts, workers have more precarious jobs, but consumers spend less over all.
The thing is workers are consumers in other areas of their life. The Libertarian justification for eliminating tariffs is that, without tariffs, people have more economic liberty through lower costs to make optimal choices in their lives. Their rejection of tariffs derives from the inefficiencies tariffs introduce into the market that raise costs and hamper economic liberty. So, if, as you say, we raise tariffs to protect American workers, we're cutting off our hand to save our fingers.
Naturally, Cato Institute is also in favor of increasing immigration.
True, there is a balance. Personally I think we can get more protective without cutting off our hand.
Hell, look at the chicken tax. Pickups have a big tariff on them, theyre made here, and theyre still very popular.
Yeah, and people who buy light trucks pay a premium for it then turn around and complain about high gas prices.
You guys shot that down, because preventing Biden from having a win was more important.
You guys pretty much admitted the panic over the border is not a priority, that it's overblown. It's just political theater.
Those are restrictions/undoing things, not actually building anything. Nor do they actually help people.
That's some PR bullshit. All you guys are doing is outing LGBTQ youth, and destroying public education all under the guise of parental rights.
What do you mean EVs?
https://www.coloradopols.com/diary/187908/republicans-celebrate-right-to-repair-that-they-opposed
Culture war bullshit is not an example of the GOP building something up to help the average American. If you think that was a good example, no wonder the GOP never gets anything real done.
Just parroting the line doesn't make it true. The bill was shot down because it was fucking abysmal and wouldn't actually accomplish anything. It was the bare minimum democrats had to do to try and shift the blame for problems they caused and refuse to fix. Not an actual solution.
Right. Republicans were demanding it go through until the moment Trump said it was bad. But it was actually the result of it not accomplishing enough. /s
Quit fooling yourself.
Up until a week ago nobody knew what was in it, dems were only releasing bullet points. Once people read it they opposed it.
You can read it for yourself and make your own decisions rather than relying on people who hate America to interpret it for you.
Don't worry I won't rely on you to interpret it for me.
The 4,000 number that triggers a border close doesn't close it, it only gives the option to close it.
Then there's the 5000 trigger but naturally there are exceptions.
Even those loopholes were not enough so they made sure they could ignore the mandatory closing.
So, just to be clear, the border should be closed even to people with who valid visas or are otherwise lawfully permitted to enter into the U.S. when the border emergency authority is activated?
Like, if an Israeli citizen shows up and wants to get through...they should be rejected if the border emergency authority is activated?
Nice try at a straw man, I'm surprised you didn't go the unaccomponied minor route.
You can just say no and amend what you mean.
How come none of you know how to argue? Pointing out a strawman just means I've misrepresented your position.
Also, the unaccompanied minor is in the bill. You posted it.
Could you point to where I said I disagree with all the exceptions, I simply listed them? If you had a desire to have a real discussion you could ask which ones I disagree with.
You might need to read up on what a straw man is, it's not just misrepresenting a position.
You seem to have missed my point about your attempted straw man. I was saying I'm surprised you didn't us the what about the kids as your straw man.
Yeah, okay, I owe you a genuine apology. You actually read it and found bits that you disagreed with and even quoted them. And, in response, I fucked by basically asserting that you believe things you don't.
I apologize for that.
I do want a real discussion. But, let's try again some other time.
But let me guess. You're just going to cry anyway when people read it and decide that it fucking sucks?
You never know until you try
Matter of fact, I'll do some reading for you. You tell me if these things are bad.
All of those sections can be found in the link of my other comment. So, this isn't even interpretation, just what is exactly in the bill.
What is here that's worth opposing exactly?
Thats not nearly all of it, thats a tiny snippet.
Yeah, which means there's more stuff that you'd probably find appealing in it!
Because if you read Republican criticisms of the bill, there's no policy discussion. It's not bad because tens of millions isn't enough, or because ICE wasn't given enough power to deport immigrants in the country with authorization, or anything else. It's just bad, just dead on arrival, just a crap sandwich. No reasoning given for why, just that it is.
They're abusing your trust in them to lie to you. The bill has what you want in it. It has what they want in it. So why isn't it being passed?
Why do you automatically assume that people are supposed to agree with it by default? It's seriously that unfathomable in your mind that someone could read it and decide it isn't a good bill?
No. I hate the bill. But it also wasn't targeted at my political demographic.
For a group of folks that justify war and suffering of others for personal and national security, you must like it more than I do. It's just a matter of whether you actually like it or just think it's okay. From what I can tell, you should actually really like it.
But here's the thing: I didn't arrive at hating the bill because I heard from AOC that it's a bad bill. Most of you heard from freakin' Fox News and Co. that it was bad bill and believe it.
Republican politicians are lying to you. The bill is a relatively good one from your perspective. But, for whatever reason, you can't pull from the wool from over your eyes to see it for yourself.
It just sounds like you have a very poor idea of what I want, in that case.
Fair enough. You seem to want what you're told to want, or to not want I suppose.
It's wild how you think constantly pretending like everyone who disagrees is too stupid to think for themselves is remotely good faith
I'm genuinely curious how you look at threads like this where he does nothing except be a total fucking condescending jackass and think "yeah, it's reasonable to have this guy deciding who's in good faith"
Gop != all conservatives. Again, not a monolith.
That bill would have made it worse.
ElectrIc vehicles. A lot of conservatives hate them and think we shouldnt be subsidizing them.
Zero explanation given, thanks. Really convincing.
So hatred of electric vehicles makes the average american better off? What the fuck are you talking about?
We webt over this in an earlier post, didnt we?
Also Im not going to pretend to fully understand ev hate, other than when assholes chop up classics to put in an ev drivetrain. I just put it in there because its usually conservatves who do it
But what does it have to do with helping the average american?
Ask them, not me.
But you're the one who brought it up as support for the claim that conservatives are helping the average american.