1388
Crunchyroll (lemy.lol)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
532 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Bluesky Post.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 75 points 2 years ago (7 children)

How is it legal that you can purchase a company, without also acquiring their liabilities and obligations?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago

    Likely because the original company had terms similar to others where digital content "ownership" is only an "ongoing license/subscription to access" which they can revoke (which is the real issue with any sort of online digital media)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Funimation bought Crunchyroll, then moved everything to the Crunchyroll name.

    "Crunchyroll" isn't the one doing this...it's funimation. Which, arguably, only make it worse. If funamation wanted to it would be easy....they don't want to honour those purchases.

    Edit: I just found out technically Sony is the one that bought Crunchyroll and is technically "merging" them. So again, would be 100% possible if funimation sony wanted to.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    I bet there was no obligation for funimation to keep "purchased" content for life.

    There is no owning when we are talking about digital stream copies

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Exactly. Somewhere in the Funimation ToS, there is almost certainly a clause that absolves them of any obligation of keeping anything you bought available to you at all times. You never owned anything you bought from Funimation in the first place, so there is no obligation to fulfill for Crunchy Roll.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    This shit should be hella illegal. Same with 600 page long ToS. You're buying a movie, not negotiating a global trade agreement. Companies should not be allowed to redefine words in their fine print. Whoever approved these practices should be dragged into town square, tarred, and feathered.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent