Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
That doesn't mean they get to see how all users from all other federated instances are voting on things...server admins only get to see how their own local users are voting, and this shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone - those votes would obviously have to be stored in a local database somewhere and it's a foregone conclusion that server admins would have access to any data stored on the servers they administer.
When someone says "votes are public" that kind of implies 'publicly visible'...and they clearly are not. It'd be like making the claim that your private text messages you send to your friends and family 'are public' because the administrators working for your cell phone carrier could access them if they wanted/needed to.
It could be that what you're saying is correct but this post suggests otherwise.
That's very insightful. I still don't think that qualifies as being 'public', but given a malicious instance operator they could be exposed if that post is accurate.
Yes it's not 'public' in a broadcast sense but it's in the 'no reasonable expectation of privacy' bracket.