635
Tea. Rule Grey. Hot.
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
635 points (100.0% liked)
196
18004 readers
437 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts are not allowed
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Correct me if I am wrong here but isn't this like the best example of why the current "AI" isn't taking over anything anytime soon or shouldn't be doing critical stuff?
Like, this is almost exactly how current LLMs work.
Edit: yeah no, I was wrong on the internet! Was sleepy, and I think I imagined that the secondary scenario never ocurred in the trained dataset, requiring a true deduction... ?
Yeah, you are wrong. This has nothing to do with LLMs or how AI today works. What was it that led you to that conclusion?
I've edited the comment with some extra, but I would still rather say my yesterday me was just high and act like this never happened haha
No worries!