you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 68 points 2 years ago (31 children)

No.

This is a load of shit. Why it has up votes blows my mind.

Do some reading or watching of hunter gatherer societies and you'll see lots of group survival activities. Teamwork in hunts, in preserving food, in crafting tools, and making shelter.

If we were this self-centered, we wouldn't have such advanced communication, which is how we were able to do all those group activities.

Survival of the fittest is survival of those that cooperate.

  • source
  • hideshow 31 child comments
  • [–] 63 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Why it has up votes blows my mind.

    Because it's funny? Honestly why your comment is so highly upvoted is blowing my mind, although I mean you no ill-will by that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Its part of the lemmy meta-game at this point is to take a joke super seriously and go on a psudo-intellectual rant about how the contents of the joke are the sum of everything wrong with humanity. Everyone needs their 5 minutes on the high horse

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    I kind of read it more as the cavemen slowly coming to realize that they are both better off with mutual co-operation rather than that they are better off by simply being greedy, because the risk of the greed was too big. It was in their best self-interest to work with one another, i.e. they were both self-centered, and were still able to co-operate. Sort of some selfish gene type stuff, I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago*

    It's so funny to me (in the positive way!) that your comment actually transforms this comic into a piece of art by giving it a social commentary (and by interpreting its meaning). And by making it art, you basically give the best counterpoint against "it's not historically accurate" .

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    How is the one with the meat better off? He should have just merc'd the asshole that showed up demanding shit from him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Stomach too full. Meat will go bad before eat all of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    So use it to enable someone who just threatened to kill you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Survival of the fittest is survival of those that cooperate

    The question nobody ever asks about survival of the fittest is what actually makes someone fit to survive?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    That for nature to decide!

    Today: Be faster than your prey!

    Tomorrow: Have endothermic heat regulation so that you survive the asteroid impact that's going to blot out the sun!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    They went from threatening to kill each other to sharing food, then contemplating trading more food in promise of later trades. This is a message of progress and cooperation. Extrapolating this forward, I have no doubt that this is the groundwork for the teamwork you describe. Any hesitancy along the way seems like no big deal to me.

  • source
  • parent