150
submitted 2 years ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Matthew Beddingfield, 22, who pleaded guilty to assaulting or impeding officers on Jan. 6, was identified by online sleuths who got a lead with facial recognition.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] -5 points 2 years ago

Please post them in the comments, it adds to the discussion and aids your point.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Or, you know, you could take 30 seconds to inform yourself... But, then again, that would mean that you can't feign ignorance about the topic anymore.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Did you know Google doesn't give the same results to each person and actually hides results? This is why it is important to reference websites in socal media when trying to make a point. Stop thinking everyone has access to whatever you see.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Yes, I know how Google works. Which also means that I know how to use the search to get the results I need.

[-] [email protected] -3 points 2 years ago

Great, now try that search in Canada. Try that search in Poland.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

aren't you the one who wants the information? why are you demanding others find it for you?

[-] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago

Sure, if I knew what they were searching for and where. You are also making huge assumptions on the search capabilities of the average person. It's better to link to its when making an argument so all parties have access to the information.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sure, if I knew what they were searching for

you said so yourself in your first comment in this thread:

I believe they are referring to the Georgia Floyd protests, though I’m not aware of any significant sentences related to that.

also

and where

if you're curious as to what search engine to use, the one mentioned several times in this comment thread (including by you):

Google

also

You are also making huge assumptions on the search capabilities of the average person.

show me where i made these alleged assumptions. a quote or a link to the comment would do.

It’s better to link to its when making an argument so all parties have access to the information.

please do

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

they don't need help making their point.

this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
150 points (97.5% liked)

politics

24869 readers
3126 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS