Police were dispatched toward Smith's residence but were called off when they learned it was a false alarm and that everyone inside the home was safe.

Special counsel Jack Smith, who is overseeing the prosecution of former President Donald Trump in two federal cases, was the target of an attempted swatting at his Maryland residence on Christmas Day.

According to two law enforcement sources, someone called 911 and said that Smith had shot his wife at the address where Smith lives.

Montgomery County Police dispatched units toward the home but were called off when the Deputy U.S. Marshals protecting Smith and his family told police that it was a false alarm and that everyone inside the home was safe.

No arrests have been made in connection with the incident.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 189 points 2 years ago (53 children)

No arrests have been made in connection with the incident.

This shit needs to change. This has been a problem for too many years now.

  • source
  • hideshow 53 child comments
  • [–] 87 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    For real. Maybe people will take it seriously now that we've gone from the swatting live steamers to swatting representatives and elected officials.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 102 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    This incidence of swatting is literally terrorism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I get that, but we tend to not take terrorism very seriously when it's domestic terrorism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago (27 children)

    Yeah. When I first heard about swatting you heard about arrests. Now it seems like the cops don't give a shit.

    When I was in school you'd get a bomb threat in the county once a year or so but they always caught them. How are police so inept now?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 2 years ago (23 children)

    Because our phone regulations are absolute shit now and thus it’s much easier to hide this shit with everything now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This is the real answer. Arrest the spoofers. Anyone can vpn and spoof a phone call. It's why I don't answer my phone anymore

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    I don't answer my phone either. I have a special Ring tone for the family, that's it. At work I got moved to a new location and asked me if I needed my phone. I said no and haven't used the office phone since. I email companies and setup in person meetings or teams meetings. There's no need for a phone at work if one can just do teams.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (21 replies)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    When I was in school you’d get a bomb threat in the county once a year or so but they always caught them.

    I'm actually surprised about that. Maybe you went to school at a different time from me? I graduated in 1995. A couple of times a year, some kid (probably) would call in a bomb threat so they could get out of a test or whatever and they never got caught. We had a pay phone right outside the school, which didn't help.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Can’t have swatting problems if you don’t have swat teams.

    Seriously, there should be a major push for police departments to de-emphasize swat and stop executing no-knock warrants.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    They’ll get whoever did this. The feds don’t take getting messed with lightly

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Not sure it could be considered attempted murder, but harm & death are real risks in a swat raid.

    Not to mention cost and risk to the officers. It should be a very serious crime. Not sure what crime it is though. I wouldn't be surprised if it were treated the same as filing a false report which would be way too lenient.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -19 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    I think it's awful, but how do you suggest making changes? The only thing I can think of is tracking 9-1-1 calls, but doing more of that discourages people from anonymously calling in emergencies, which could lead to more deaths.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago* (2 children)

    911 calls are tracked. Listen to your local police scanner. Even if someone calls and immediately hangs up, they have a pretty good idea where that person was calling from.

    I think @MagicShel meant we should actually use the information we already have, and prosecute it like the attempted murder that it is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Listen to your local police scanner.

    Can't. It's encrypted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    Encrypted? Or digital? I thought the one here was because all you could hear was what sounded like modem static when someone keyed up. Turns out it was just a digital "encryption" that could be defeated with a $20 baofeng radio.

    There are however a few places that are straight up encrypted with their own keys, and not much you can do about that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    Last time I called 9-1-1 they confirmed my location, and name without me telling them who, or where I was calling from.

    9-1-1 only cares about getting help to the scene. AND, if being anonymous is an issue for you, use burners.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

    At a minimum tell the responding officers that the call was anonymous and hasn't been verified. I don't know beyond that. Remove anonymity but also seal the records automatically to be unsealed only if the call itself is a crime? But we've had a long time to deal with this and think about solutions, and it's hard to believe we've not come up with a single way to address the issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    It actually could be very hard to find the perpetrator with overseas VPNs and VOIP phone numbers that can be spoofed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Dude I knew about that stuff before most people in the world, 20 years ago.

    VPNs can still make users anonymous, regardless of all the above. They are not cracking strong encryption in those tunnels, and overseas VPN providers can provide anonymizing VPN services that they won't be able to trace. There may actually be nothing they can do about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment