this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2024
17 points (100.0% liked)
Moving to: m/AskMbin!
5 readers
2 users here now
### We are moving! **Join us in our new journey as we take a new direction towards the future for this community at mbin, find our new community here and read this post to know more about why we are moving. Thank you and we hope to see you there!**
founded 1 year ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
i think part of the issue is the conflation of instance branding/application name. i wish they were a bit more distinct.
external 'kbin' users would be any federating platform, in this context. kbin.social users are that, @kbin.social
for example, if someone was running kbin.nonsense.com and wanted to change to mbin, they would be stuck with the kbin branding.
the site branding should be somewhat agnostic to the underlying application (in my opinion, of course).
I see where you're coming from, though having the instance be related to the underlying software helps a lot with clarity. I still have trouble remembering whether programming.dev is a Lemmy or Mastodon instance, whereas lemmy.ca causes no such issues.
Also, with Kbin and Mbin, I don't think it's much of an issue. Kbin.run uses Mbin, and I've never seen that as odd. The differences between the two aren't very significant anyway (i.e., it's clear that they're both versions of the same general thing). I could see it being a problem if you wanted to switch your instance from Kbin to Lemmy, but that seems like an unlikely scenario that isn't worth the sacrifice in clarity.