1."Federal agencies have the authority to intervene in protests, picket signs, or blockades. The law is impartial: it must be enforced without exception."
2."Federal forces are not required to have judicial oversight for their actions."
3."Forces are not obligated to consider alternative entrances or pathways. If the main path is blocked, their duty is to clear it."
4."This action continues until the flow of traffic is fully restored."
5."To carry out these acts, forces will use the minimum necessary force, which is sufficient and proportional to the situation they are addressing."
6."Instigators and organizers of the protest will be identified."
7."Vehicles used in the protest will be identified and subjected to citations or penalties."
8."Data of the instigators, accomplices, participants, and organizers will be transmitted to the authorities through appropriate channels."
9."Notices will be sent to the judge in cases of damage, such as burning flags."
10."In cases involving minors, relevant authorities will be notified, and the guardians of these youths who bring them to these demonstrations will face sanctions and punishment."
11."The costs incurred by security operations will be borne by the responsible organizations or individuals. In cases involving foreigners with provisional residency, information will be forwarded to the National Directorate of Immigration."
12."A registry will be created for organizations that participate in these types of actions."
Yeah the more comments of theirs I read the more I think they actually do, welp at least I tried and got some writing practice from it
Eh, nothing wrong with combined-arms posting.
I think you did good! I apologize for the tone in my response to your initial post - I believe the content of my response, but the phrasing should not be so hostile.
Dunks are good and important, but so is the patient guidance. Not so much for the individual you're responding to, but for the audience we talked about before. Having both is a great aid.
Ah you don't need to apologize, what I posted was in good intentions but mostly an L. Myself I don't really care for tone and on the tone policing struggle session I remember being on the side of being against it too. And now I think a duo of approaches in an online forum setting with a bigger emphasis on the crowd might just be the better approach. Because I thought of me becoming a commie through GenZedong and well, I was mostly a lurker, part of the crowd. Still I'll keep to my more considerate approach.
diversity of tactics, comrade. I'm sure others got something out of your replies.