this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
18 points (100.0% liked)

NotAwfulTech

386 readers
4 users here now

a community for posting cool tech news you don’t want to sneer at

non-awfulness of tech is not required or else we wouldn’t have any posts

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
18
The official awful.systems Advent of Code 2023 thread (awful.systems)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
121 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Rules: no spoilers.

The other rules are made up as we go along.

Share code by link to a forge, home page, pastebin (Eric Wastl has one here) or code section in a comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Re: LCM, I figured my favorite Perl library ntheory had it, and I was right! This a godsend for Project Euler, too.

(The first year of AoC leaned heavily on these kinds of problems, and Python itertools utterly destroyed the puzzles.)

Re: leaderboard participants - I believe many of them are involved in programming contests, generally, and if you do enough of these, you recognize patterns, and you have routines for a lot of stuff. Also there are tools to download the puzzle inputs automatically.

My personal take on how to do AoC: https://gerikson.com/blog/comp/adventofcode/Howto-AoC.html (maybe already posted, I don't care)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for the insight. I haven’t done much AoC, and this largely confirms the vibes I’ve been getting this time around.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Much like a high IQ score doesn't show intelligence, but rather the aptitude to take IQ tests, being good at AoC does not show you are a good programmer, but rather that you are good at programming challenges.