Leftguistics
A place to discuss linguistics with or without Marxist context, this includes discussion of Phonetics, Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics.
Rules:
No oppressive language-
No using slurs for any oppressed group. They (them/theirs) is (are) a perfectly fine gender neutral pronoun(s) of which is not always plural.
No reactionary political opinions-
This applies to all Lemmygrad communities and it applies here.
Euro-centrism-
European languages are completely fine here though try not to in anyway point to non-European languages as "odd" or "foreign." As well don't push colonial theories about language.
Last point: all those who speak out against the voiceless uvular plosive will be sent the gulag.
(keep in mind you may be banned for other inappropriate behavior not listed in the rules)
(read this: https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1950/jun/20.htm)
view the rest of the comments
At least when communicating through writing I've also seen adding the symbol "@" at the end of the words (like amig@s = amigos and amigas) to make them gender neutral, but this obviously is binary and doesn't take non-binary people into account. And only works with writing. I do prefer the 'e' at the end of words for this reason and it also sounds/looks better than adding X, but Spanish isn't my primary language. Would be interesting to hear other people's thoughts.
I don't have Spanish as my first language but my first language is pretty related to Spanish and s also gendered and I personally hate all those alternatives. The @ and the X thing can't be read by screen readers so these options aren't inclusive at all, also this is pretty confusing for dyslexic people...
I personally think this is a case where people just have to understand that grammatical gender is not the same as social gender, even words like milk and chair are grammatically gendered, so don't make sense to Try to say there's any hidden message using the masculine or feminine form of the words...