this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
262 points (84.1% liked)

politics

19144 readers
5759 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Commentary: Longtime former Republican on Patrick Deneen and the demise of the conservative intellectual

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The former, yes, the latter I bet we have significant disagreements on the definition of

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tangentially, if you’re interested in rabbit holes, there’s a book by Matt Kennard called Silent Coup that deals with corporate influence over trade, it looks at the agreements countries have to sign to get corporations into their countries.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm well aware of this process and support it. Countries are welcome to make any deals they'd like. They're presumably intelligent, independent entities making decisions in their own best interest.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you’re in favor of BRICS and the devaluation of the petrodollar, if those countries choose to do that?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I recognize their right and potential desire to do it, but I think the likely economic responses and ensuing global downturn isn't worth the eventual possible payoff for them

As an example of an actual unpopular opinion I have, I think it's good that countries sell Nestle their water rights and then buy water back from them, if it results in a large enough economic impact for their nation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do you think that opinion is unpopular?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

It is unpopular in my circles, which includes a lot of "fuck nestle" kind of people

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe they did the maths and think it’s worth it. The “PetroYuan” sounds weird

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am quite confident that the dollar will remain the world currency, likely until we move to a single world currency in the far future.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don’t think Nestle or other corporations ever do wrong? Maybe your friends think they do

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone does wrong at some point, including all businesses. Corporations aren't monoliths

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So it’s okay if Nestle exploits an entire community as long as it serves the greater good?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If Nestle bought the property to your town’s water supply, and sold it back to you for a profit, that would still be for the greater good?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it means jobs at Nestle, income for the government from a large corporation that otherwise wouldn't exist in a developing nation, and increased standard of living nationwide? Yes, absolutely.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes, supporting one act certainly means I support all acts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The subject was Nestle, you replied that you would support them despite crimes; ie, you support child slavery. Just read about it man. Yes, I’m a degenerate, idiot , fuckup of a man; and should probably suffer and die a horrible death. Just learn.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I know more than you, and yet have not insulted you at all. You made that up

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m genuinely scared for our future.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

My quote, not yours.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You think because you have an unpopular opinion, your friends are wrong, never trying to understand why. I was self deprecating to disarm your ego, to no avail. Everyone else is wrong, you are right. Now convince your friends that Nestle is the pinnacle of the free market. Good luck.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

everyone else is wrong. You are right

I corrected your comma splice in the quote but yes, generally. It's a consequence of actually looking things up all the time

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You quoted yourself quoting me? I was just trying to help you understand why your friends dislike Nestle, but you seem hostile. You should explore why?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

No, I quoted you. I fixed your splice in the quote.

I haven't been hostile toward you whatsoever.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can have all the quotes. Just stop embarrassing me with your intellect. It’s unassailable and frightens me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Idk why you're trying to "stock internet argument" this whole thing, but this conversation is 100% your doing. Also you're not even responding to the comments you clearly intend to be responding to.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry, replies are not working right. It is all my fault, all of it. Sometimes people do the the wrong thing, we’re not monoliths.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

See you're catching on!