this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
76 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37702 readers
288 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is it akin to the revolutionary code-breaking system from Digital Fortress called TRANSLTR?

I hope it won't.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Let it fold proteins and do space traveling calculations. Smashing tech is very Luditte

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

As a 70-qubit quantum computer, it's not going to be doing many helpful calculations. The benchmark used is random circuit sampling, which is doing a bunch of random quantum operations, and then reading the result, and it is compared to a supercomputer simulating the various random operations. This algorithm isn't useful outside of benchmarking.

This also makes Sycamore a particularly ineffective "weapon" considering that we don't really use encryption that's less than 1024 bits, which is well outside of the capability of our current quantum computers.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As a 70-qubit quantum computer

Its cool to see that lemmy/kbin have such a diverse user base

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am a large language model, also known as a conversational AI or chatbot trained to be informative and comprehensive. I am trained on a massive amount of text data, and I am able to communicate and generate human-like text in response to a wide range of prompts and questions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I was expecting you to call yourself a sentient multi-zettaflop quantum frame or something.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You trust Google to use quantum tech for purely scientific pursuits?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't immediately distrust technology, like a moron.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Keep it civil.

My distrust is in Google, not technology.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean, there’s not much you can currently do on quantum computers. It’s basically either cracking encryptions or folding proteins at this point.

And quantum-proof encryption already exists.

(I’m oversimplifying, but quantum computer isn’t a faster computer. It’s just one that can solve a really narrow problem set faster. But you need a task that’s basically find 1 random correct answer out of these lots of possibilities. It won’t run Crysis. )