this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
2 points (75.0% liked)

Main

139 readers
3 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This article is from November 17th, so a couple days old, but I found it worthwhile.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (9 children)

suspended prison sentence for that? 200hrs of unpaid work? lol jesus, thats excessive

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Reading through the list of consequences, the social consequences were probably a sufficient deterrent. Losing jobs and banned from football matches (the football association being distinct from the government).

Not a fan of governments getting involved in prosecuting speech. I think social sanctions and consequences are more appropriate, even for heinous speech like this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The odd thing is, what are these social consequences? Getting abuse and threats to the point of moving home is also something that needs acting on, surely. Or are they just deciding who can and can't have abuse aimed at them?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I mean they probably would act upon it but things like that are extremely easy to do anonymously, compared to being stupid enough to do what this guy did at a football match

load more comments (6 replies)