2
Football fan gets suspended sentence after mocking mascot Bradley Lowery (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 2 years ago by [B] to c/main@soccer.forum
105 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This article is from November 17th, so a couple days old, but I found it worthwhile.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (9 children)

suspended prison sentence for that? 200hrs of unpaid work? lol jesus, thats excessive

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    Justice imo. You don’t mock a child who lost a battle to cancer. No excuses for that. Fucker got what he deserved.

    Hope he enjoys the 200 hours unpaid graft too.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    It's not justice though my dude, the punishment doesn't fit the crime tbh.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Shouldn't even been a crime for the authorities to prosecute. This was something that should of been settled between the team and him. Ban him from attendance. This is censorship whether we like the results or not.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    Freedom of speech doesn’t exist in the UK and it never has. The right to freedom of expression is subject to a range of restrictions in UK law, including the: Malicious Communications Act 1988 and the Communications Act 2003, which criminalises “indecent or grossly offensive” messages and threats.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    Reading through the list of consequences, the social consequences were probably a sufficient deterrent. Losing jobs and banned from football matches (the football association being distinct from the government).

    Not a fan of governments getting involved in prosecuting speech. I think social sanctions and consequences are more appropriate, even for heinous speech like this.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    The odd thing is, what are these social consequences? Getting abuse and threats to the point of moving home is also something that needs acting on, surely. Or are they just deciding who can and can't have abuse aimed at them?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    I mean they probably would act upon it but things like that are extremely easy to do anonymously, compared to being stupid enough to do what this guy did at a football match

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    I think the fact that he printed something out at home shows it wasn't a complete spur of the moment thing and that's why its a bit harsher.

    When youre at home whipping up something to make fun of a child of cancer, how does nothing in your brain go off telling you to stop?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent