this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
2 points (75.0% liked)

Main

139 readers
3 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This article is from November 17th, so a couple days old, but I found it worthwhile.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (18 children)

What a fucking moron.

Basically torn his own world apart for literally no reason at all.

For anyone who can't click on the link, in doing this utterly fucking stupid thing, he has:

  • Been given a 5-year stadium ban.

  • Had to pay a £154 victim surcharge.

  • Had to pay £85 in prosecution costs.

  • 12-week suspended prison sentence (suspended for up to 18 months).

  • Ordered to do 200 hours of unpaid work.

What a fucking moron.

It even says in the article that he's had to move out of his parents' home because of the backlash his actions caused, and apparently his relationship with his partner has been affected too.

Can't believe someone would willingly do something like that anyway, such a stupid and unkind thing to do, and that's even before you get to how fucking stupid it is to do these days anyway, especially when we live in a world where everything is recorded.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (9 children)

suspended prison sentence for that? 200hrs of unpaid work? lol jesus, thats excessive

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Reading through the list of consequences, the social consequences were probably a sufficient deterrent. Losing jobs and banned from football matches (the football association being distinct from the government).

Not a fan of governments getting involved in prosecuting speech. I think social sanctions and consequences are more appropriate, even for heinous speech like this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The odd thing is, what are these social consequences? Getting abuse and threats to the point of moving home is also something that needs acting on, surely. Or are they just deciding who can and can't have abuse aimed at them?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I mean they probably would act upon it but things like that are extremely easy to do anonymously, compared to being stupid enough to do what this guy did at a football match

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)