this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
36 points (100.0% liked)

Comradeship // Freechat

2142 readers
83 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That can just be liberalism though, there’s not much a difference anyway, but fascism is more specific.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

the first item, yes, but the second is not inherent to liberalism (the proletariat is always repressed, but it's not a minority group)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So by your definition many liberal countries have been fascist before fascism was first theorized (colonialism, homophobia…). Have you read the Really Existing Fascism yet? Roderic basically writes that fascism is little different than regular liberalism besides a return to primitive accumulation.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

colonialism is not repression of the domestic population, but homophobia to the point of mass state violence against homosexual people would fit the second criterion; new terms can be applied retroactively

Have you read the Really Existing Fascism yet? Roderic basically writes that fascism is little different than regular liberalism besides a return to primitive accumulation.

I haven't; that definition doesn't make sense to me, but maybe it will after I read it