Technology

37712 readers

230 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

YouTube once again ahead of uBO on Firefox; fiddling with the extension settings not working this time and DDG search is useless ... anyone got ideas? (beehaw.org)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

72 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Pretty much the subject line. uBO has successfully blocked the nag screen enough times that I can't play anything at this point. No preview loads, and the play button serves no function. I'd really prefer not to have to find content on YT, copy the URL and use Piped/Invidious, but this ongoing escalation is steeling my resolve to screw Google.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't think you can be sure they're not profiling you for advertising on other sites just because they're not showing ads on YouTube. The purpose of uBO is security. Plus I wouldn't give money to a shady company like Google anyway.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I hope you are contributing to the content creators in other ways, then.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I am, as it happens, but I don't feel under any obligation to.

Firstly, how they get paid is a private matter between them and YouTube, they signed their contracts, not me.

Secondly, YouTube could run privacy-respecting non-targeted ads. I'm not punishing YouTube for having ads, I'm punishing them for being spyware.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

YouTube doesn't stop you from using uBO if you're paying.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the 'shady company' part of paying is an important consideration.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Correct, if they weren't user-hostile, it would have been more likely I would have built up some good-will towards them and would be happy to pay.