politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
The solution to the debt is taxing the rich, and equitably too. They're going to have to pay double for the amount they've stolen from we the people since 1980.
That's going to have to be part of it, but it can't be all of it. There isn't enough money in the upper class to take care of all of the debt, and at a certain level of taxation they will just move. I will speak in favor of increasing taxes on around pretty much every individual making over 100k or couple making over 200k. For a single person working 40 hours a week in the US, that is the 77th percentile. My husband and I are in this position and I think starting the additional tax burden with us would be fair.
I don't see raising taxes much below us as being very productive, and those "flat tax" people can fuck right off. That group is already paying money into entitlements so the oft repeated statement that half of households pay no income tax is misleading. They're really struggling right now, so I just don't see an increase in taxes as productive.
Stockholme syndrome
EDIT TO CLARIFY: "There isnt enough wealth to tax to cover ALL the debt" is both a bad faith argument and reducto ad absurdum. Nobody expects $33T to be raised in one year or even ten by taking from the 1%. It's also absurd to speak as if their wealth is static and not replenishing daily.
"If we tax them they will just leave" is the mantra of the battered housewife. They're free to leave but they are not free to take the infrastructure that we gave them to be in business, and they are not free to continue doing business in the country that allowed that business to thrive and grow. When they walk away, they leave the house and car. They are free to go restart their business somewhere else. Let them try to tell the Chinese that they have businesses in the Cayman Islands for tax write-offs.
They make over 200k a year, not exactly struggling.
Yeah, 200k and DINK. I want to have my taxes raised, just as long as others like me also have have their taxes raised.
The problem with doing that is that people then get more hesitant about putting money into a country. Would you invest in a country if there's a good chance its leadership is just going to do an about face and tax your wealth into nothing? Take your possessions? It's part of the reason why many countries struggle to get foreign investment. Their past has caused businesses to have little faith that investments won't just get nationalized by the government.
High corporate taxation Made America Great. Low taxation destroyed it and created oligarchy. Undeniable.