this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
181 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10181 readers
69 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So it looks like Trump has read the fascist playbook or something. I'm not surprised. I am concerned.

Edit: After thinking about it, I guess I am surprised that he can read.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Do you honestly think the Republicans wouldn’t support Israel?

What in my comment gave you that impression? Do you think that just because both parties would do it absolves you from being complicit in it?

And a vote for 3rd parties is a vote for Republicans.

So is a vote for Democrats, since they're doing nothing to actually stop Republicans. The 2 party system is built so that control switches between the 2 parties. One party will never hold it indefinitely.

And Israel would be attacking Palestine even without US support

So your argument is that we may as well just go along with the genocide since it will happen with or without us?

This is peak Centrism. "I don't agree with the genocide, but I'll go along with it since I've got nothing better to do."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not everyone agrees it's a genocide.

If Israel wanted they have the weapons and ability to raze Gaza to the ground and kill everyone in it in a matter of weeks. But they haven't done that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"If you do the genocide slow, it's not really a genocide! Not everyone agrees that killing thousands of children of one particular ethnicity is a genocide, anyways. They should be thankful they're not all dead already, because if Israel wanted them to be, they could do it. Really, only killing this many makes Israel the good guys here!"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you just want Israel to let Hamas attack and kill them then? Because Hamas attacks from populated areas, any counter attacks will result in civilian casualties.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Holy false dichotomies, Batman!

"In order to prevent the genocide, Israel must commit the genocide!" BIG BRAIN!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a pretty piss poor attempt at a genocide by Israel. They have the armaments and ability to have wiped out everyone in Gaza by now. If they wanted thew Palestinians genocided, they could have done it already.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think you are confused about the definition of genocide.

It doesn't mean to exterminate all people in an area.

It means to kill large numbers of people based on their ethnicity or nationality, which Israel is doing. They not targeting Hamas, they're targeting Palestinians, and they're doing it in such a way to make Gaza uninhabitable. All the infra is being targeted. All the hospitals are being targeted. Over 40% of the housing units are destroyed already. It's a genocide.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Still a piss poor attempt.