this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
604 points (95.8% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35606 readers
126 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
604
AAAA (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 190 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Windows is slowly transitioning from a paid and solid OS to freemuim spyware bloated dumb OS.

[–] [email protected] 117 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Slowly? This crap has been going on for years.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Isn't a process happening gradually over years "slowly"?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Would that not be slowly? What would you call slowly in this context?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I don’t recall such issues with Win98 or XP

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dude, that was 22 years ago... I also remember Prince of Persia as if it were yesterday

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I miss Windows Vista.

The arrow pointing downwards is about to be absolutely destroyed today. Edit: it turns out that it didn't.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I used to dual boot linux with windows Vista on an old laptop. I had only installed there the first assassin's creed and Rome total war. Nothing else, never really connected to internet. After 1 year of not using it a part than few total war sessions, vista was so slow that was unusable. It spontaneously became slow for no reason. I completely removed it, left only linux, and that laptop survived 7 years of intensive use, and was still working 10 years later (just too old).

Vista was a scam

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Good for you, I'm never gonna get convinced.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Vistas problem was that it was ahead of its time

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I both agree and disagree with that statement.

Windows finally got animations and transparency when Mac OS has beaten it by 6 years. Truly an oomph moment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Windows finally got animations and transparency when Mac OS has beaten it by 6 years. Truly an oomph moment.

The actual technological advancement of Vista was userspace graphics drivers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, XP did that with most of the drivers other than graphics, which lead to a reduction in BSOD crashes (because if a user thread crashes, the OS just kills it and continues on, but an unhandled kernel error will crash the entire OS to a generic "turn the screen blue, report and error, and log it, if possible").

Vista further improved this by moving most of the graphics driver code out of kernel land.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I sort of agree with you, but not in the way I think you meant it.

Vista's problem was that it's hardware requirements were too high for it's time. Operating systems have very long project development lifecycle and at a point early on they did a forward looking estimate of where the PC market would be by the time Vista released, and they overshot. When it was almost ready to release it to the world Microsoft put out the initial minimum and recommended specs and PC sellers (Dell, HP, Gateway) lobbied them to lower the numbers; the cost of a PC that met the recommended specs was just too high for the existing PC market and it would kill their sales numbers if they started selling PCs that met those figures. Microsoft complied and lowered the specs, but didn't actually change the operating system in any meaningful way - they just changed a few numbers on a piece of paper and added some configurations that let you disable some of the more hardware intensive bits. The result was that most Vista users were running it on hardware that wasn't actually able to run it properly, which lead to horrible user experiences. Anyone that bought a high end PC or built one themselves and ran Vista on that, however, seemed quite happy with the operating system.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I had no problems with Vista. I also built a new PC for it though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Very similar story here: I bought a new computer that shipped with Vista.

I got horrendously tired of that Pentium 4 thing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Blasphemy! Windows XP is the only King!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I don't really like XP's design anymore. I didn't like it back then either.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ready to feel old, that was 11 years ago^oo^oo^o

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Ah maan, why'd you have to tell me that, it still feels like it came out just 3-4 years ago tops

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It started with Windows 8

Win8 wasn't freemium. Win10 was.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

True but it's when Microsoft started to implement apps and such for tablets and hybrid laptops along with office 365.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Windows 2000 🫶

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Because at this time the internet was still slow, not always on and optional on most computers, and Microsoft did not know if and how they should integrate the internet into the OS. The only thing they had at the time was some link to MSN on the desktop, and activeX (???) Where you could display websites on your desktop or within your program, but without the Browser controlls.