this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
1054 points (97.6% liked)
Programmer Humor
19471 readers
1467 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Friendly reminder if you prefer dealing with JSON - YAML is a superset of JSON, so any valid JSON is also valid YAML.
That’s more of a weakness of yaml. There’s so many ways to specify the exact same thing. Not exactly what you need for configuration files maintained by multiple people. It easily becomes an big incoherent mess.
In JSON the default way is the only way. Nice and coherent.
I agree that YAML is painful and it really seems like it's had a lot of feature creep.
JSON is painful in its own way too, though. There's a lot of syntax noise from things like braces, quotation marks, etc, so it's easy to make a mistake. Regular JSON doesn't allow trailing commas.
YAML tried to solve some of that, and did succeed in some ways, but introduced its own issues.
TOML seems great to me, but maybe it has its own issues. TOML actually has defined data formats for things like dates (both offset and local) and times, which is missing from both JSON and YAML so every app ends up doing it its own way.
One big thing of JSON I hate is that sometimes is used for config files or similar and it doesn't supports comments which sucks.
JSONC does support comments but it wouldn't be interoperable with anything expecting pure JSON. But still useful for local configs.
Found out the hard way that no, it's not.. there are a few valid json files that most yaml parsers choke on