this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
1111 points (97.9% liked)

World News

38977 readers
2069 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Almost 90 bombs were dropped in one region in just 24 hours.

Russia unleashed an unprecedented bombardment in southern Ukraine overnight in what local officials described as a “massive attack” in the conflict which has continued to rage even as the international community’s attention has moved to the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza.

The Ukrainian Internal Affairs Ministry on Monday morning said Russia dropped at least “87 aerial bombs on populated areas of the Kherson region - the largest number for all time.” At least eight people were also injured in other Russian strikes carried out in the Odessa region further to the west on Sunday night.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • Russian: fighting an armed country and fueled by NATO members
  • Israel: fighting. I mean BOMBING from their heated offices, civil without shoes and haven't sleep for 2weeks

Oh and between, Russia has been cut off from SWIFT, assets frozen if not stolen, etc etc... Israel? freepass

You can't make more cynical, and binary treatment, you can't

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (16 children)

Russia: fighting to expand their territory because they want a new world order led by them Israel: responding to their most terrifying act of terror ever happened on their land.

Reason matters, and a lot. Russia has no good reason to invade Ukraine, Israel has a very good reason to invade Gaza.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Theyre both violating the Geneva Convention...

There's no valid reason to violate that, that's the whole point of it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Actually Israel isn't technically violating the Geneva Convention. When you co-locate civilian and military targets, the civilian infrastructure loses it's protections under the Convention.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The occupation of the West Bank is in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention, article 49. This has been established by the International Court of Justice in a ruling from 2004. Israel's defense was indeed that the territory is disputed instead of occupied, but it's the only country that holds this position. Literally the only country in the world.

The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.

Sources: Fourth Geneva Convention, ruling of the International Court of Justice (relevant are paragraphs 90-101)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The West Bank isn't at war. The Gaza Strip is. That's the area Israel pulled out of and evicted (some at gunpoint) every Jewish settler; even those who had been there since before the 1948 partition plan. They've respected the 1967 borders there with no settlements as a way to prove that pulling back to those borders would lead to peace and not constant terrorism and warfare.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok, how does that support your argument that Israel does not violate the Geneva Convention tho?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't, he just talked about how the west bank is not relevant to the geneva convention, and his point still stands in Gaza. Civilian and terror infrastructure is intertwined in Gaza, and that's his argument.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The withdrawal of settlers and forces from Gaza was not initiated until 2005, which is almost 40 years of illegal occupation. In 2007, the occupation was officially lifted and replaced with a blockade. And they did not pull out their forces and settlers to "prove" that "pulling back to those borders would lead to peace", it was to finally fulfill the duties they agreed on in the Egypt-Israel peace treaty from 1979. The Oslo Accords that resulted from that treaty only exist because Israel did not fulfill their promises after several decades, so there were talks again.

So how about he doesn't contort the narrative so hard that it makes my head spin?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Israeli left wing parties absolutely did pull out in the belief it would lead to peace. Their political coalition didn't have the support to do the same thing in the West Bank. They believed that if peace reigned on the strip, and violence continued in the West Bank it would justify a similar settlement eviction in the WB.

The current right wing coalition would have never approved the 2004 disengagement plan. And the violence that followed it is what brought them to power.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lemmy is just weirdly pro-Hamas and anti-Israel.

Don't get me wrong, I think what Israel is doing sucks, but what Hamas is doing is equally bad. This is really a both-sides situation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)

This is really a both-sides situation.

Hamas isn't Palestine. Israeli gov isn't Israel.

When you make simple distinctions like this, things get less complicated.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Israel is killing many, many more Palestinians than Hamas is killing Israelis and it has been this way for decades.

Also, doing wrong when done "in retaliation" is still doing wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, doing wrong when done "in retaliation" is still doing wrong.

So... We agree that Israel killing civilians in response to Hamas's attack is wrong, just as Hamas killing civilians in response to persecution by Israel is wrong?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yep.

Weird how you misconstrue criticizing Israel's genocide with support for Hamas tho. Very concerning.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You left out the part where Israel has been murdering Palestinians and stealing their land for decades, and turned Gaza into an open air prison. That kind of thing pisses people off.

That still doesn't make any of this right.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You missed the part about Israel fighting Arabs and Palestinians for their very existence since 1948. It's not a simple situation. Whereas Ukraine is simply a megalomaniac trying to expand his power at all cost.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You missed the part where Arabs had been on that land for over a thousand years before the European Allies decided to sent their Jews back "home."

Also, fuck Putin.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is a difference between invading and turning Gaza into a concentration camp.

You'd think the Jews would know better.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Oh right, Gaza the concentration camp where children are forced to work with no pay, women are raped then killed and trains are used to carry people for 3 days without water/food to a gas chamber killing everyone.

Oh oops that was the Holocaust. Silly me, it's just that the media told me Gazans are experiencing the holocaust so I mixed the two up.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

its true, they should both be getting the same, punitive treatment

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I don’t support Israel, but the Russians attacked unprovoked. They’re not 1:1.