this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
705 points (98.6% liked)

tumblr

3372 readers
116 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 91 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

btw cargo ships are already incredibly efficient tho.
even if they produce a ton of co2, when divided by actual amount of goods delivered, they are hundreds of times more efficient than trucks

[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, we really should swap out all those trucks crossing the Atlantic with cargo ships.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why don't we just replace all the trucks on the road with cargo ships?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Why do I want a cargo ship that's got no fukkin wheels?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Our cargo ships have wheels though! See this post lol.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh absolutely. But why not make them even more efficient?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

1,000x efficiency is good

100,000x efficiency is better.

Besides, now is the best time to do all the r&d for when fossil fuels are non-existant. Better to figure out how to mixmax wind while you have other options than when you have no choice.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My company makes sustainable packaging, and the primary way we compete as a sustainable bag product for our food grade division is eliminating the CO2 costs associated with shipping overseas (most reusable grocery bags are made in China).

As a result, it takes around 600 of our paper bags to be as bad for the environment as one reusable bag.

While overseas shipping is necessary and as efficient as it can be (so far!), it is still a major greenhouse factor (so far!)

Also everything that touches a container ship ends up on a truck at some point, so there's not really any savings there.

Fingers crossed for the Golden Age of Sail Part 2: Wind Boogaloo, even if it hurts our bag division a bit. The net gain is too good to ignore

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think nuclear ships are more likely than giant sailships

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe, but nuclear cargo ships were tried before (e.g. NS Savannah, Otto Hahn) and failed because they were too expensive.)

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Kind of hard to send cargo by train across an ocean though...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Ramps. Jump it over the ocean.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Twas in reference to trucks. Highways have replaced rail and so trucks have replaced trains.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

When russia collapses and the US turns Siberia into west Alaska we can just build a bridge across the Bering strait.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah but in the future Arasaka is going to lay a ton of AI controlled mines all over the ocean and lose control of them and ocean travel will be impossible. Oh wait, that’s just a ttrpg and a video game. A corporation would never do something like that in today’s world…

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They also use the fuel we can't use elsewhere and many do in fact use wind power in the form of giant kites when the wind is appropriate.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Use fuel we can't use elsewhere? They use this refuse fuel because countries literally have laws banning their use within their maritime boundaries, because they're just that awful to burn. This shit fuel is used in international waters precisely because there are no international laws banning this.

Many use kites? The ship with the kites were a proof of concept, not a widely adopted maritime practice.