Went for a walk and managed to take a photo of a bird I hadn’t been able to photograph yet: A Spotted Flycatcher!
Its German name, Grauschnäpper, translates to “Grey Snatcher” — probably because it likes snatching flies and other insects!
this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
29 points (100.0% liked)
Nature and Gardening
6653 readers
2 users here now
All things green, outdoors, and nature-y. Whether it's animals in their natural habitat, hiking trails and mountains, or planting a little garden for yourself (and everything in between), you can talk about it here.
See also our Environment community, which is focused on weather, climate, climate change, and stuff like that.
(It's not mandatory, but we also encourage providing a description of your image(s) for accessibility purposes! See here for a more detailed explanation and advice on how best to do this.)
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Thank you very much! :-)
I used a Canon EOS R10 with a Tamron SP 150-600mm F/5-6.3 Di VC USD G2 at 600 mm and f/8.0. Larger apertures aren't that sharp with this lens, unfortunately.
I'd have guessed it was a larger aperture due to the isolation of the bird (Freistellung). Does this effect come from the long focal length?
Even at the center?
I'd love to photograph birds too, but i don't have the patience :) So i keep doing cows and trees and other slow moving stuff. Rocks are cool too.
Yeah, anything above f/8.0 tends to be a bit too soft for me at 600 mm. At the lens' lowest focal length of 150 mm, using f/6.3 tends to yield the sharpest results. Also remember that the larger the aperture, the smaller the number (f/6.3 is a larger aperture than f/8.0).
The effect is greatly exaggerated by the focal length, yes. The background is mostly trees that are like 20 metres away.
And yeah, photographing birds can be a bit tricky. So fast!