this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
720 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2273 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In his remarks, not only does Johnson claim Roe “gave constitutional cover to the elective killing of unborn children,” but he rails against the imagined economic detriments of abortion, pushing his caucus’ outlandish claim that by depleting a hypothetical workforce, abortion has defunded social security: “Think about the implications of that on the economy. We’re all struggling here to cover the bases of social security and Medicare and Medicaid and all the rest,” Johnson says. “If we had all those able-bodied workers in the economy we wouldn’t be going upside down and toppling over like this... Roe was a terrible corruption.” Mind you, social security and health care have been gutted in the last several years by Republican lawmakers, not people who choose to end a pregnancy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 141 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I love how they don't realize these unaborted kids are likely going to be unwanted, unloved, impoverished, lack education...and instead of turning into "able bodies workers" they will turn into the criminals Republicans think lurk around every corner ready to shoot them

[–] [email protected] 100 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I prefer the Carlin take: "They want live babies so they can turn them into dead soldiers"

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Oh they are fully aware. More criminals means more prisoners, which means more money for the prison industrial complex and super cheap (basically slave) labor.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

It's not basically slave labor. It is slave labor. The US Constitution still has codified slavery as long as you're a prisoner.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

All hail the glorious Economy! That which makes all actions moral with the magic words “It’s not personal, it’s just business.”

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everyone knows greed justifies hurting people

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Duh, greed justifies everything. Don't believe me? Here's $1000. How about now?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

And it gives gun fuchs something to shoot at

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thats exactly what they want.

They need poor uneducated voters to stay in power.

They need poor uneducated criminals to hate lest they focus on themselves and tear themselves apart.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

You forget about the prison pipeline?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I don't think they're unaware of that at all. Until those kids become criminals, most of them will have to survive somehow. Given their presumed lack of education and prospects, that means meat to throw in the "entry level" grinder.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Oh, they realize. That's the problem.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

That's a problem for the other classes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They need live births so they can grow up to be dead soldiers. Those are their favorite constituents because neither one votes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

And also because the Republicans can project their views on those groups.

"If the 'unborn baby' or dead soldier could talk, they'd say that we should absolutely overturn this election result and name Trump President again. After all, he will protect the unborn (unless they happen to reside in his mistress) and what did those soldiers die for if not President For Life Trump?!!!"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

More "leeches on society" that they also pretend are the single source of all Americas budget problems