this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
47 points (94.3% liked)
Comradeship // Freechat
2168 readers
34 users here now
Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.
A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Uber is abusive as fuck and the gig economy shouldn’t exist either.
I think it’s problematic when the hate is directed at sex workers. They’re doing something for money, just like a brick layer, because they’re desperate to eat and find shelter just like all of us but the sex industry is abusive and extremely exploitative and it shouldn’t exist. Meanwhile the brick laying industry definitely should exist which is an important distinction that gets lost.
If Uber and onlyfans cease to exist then the world is a better place, and using the humanity of sex workers as a human shield to defend their existence isn’t right.
The distinction one should make when analyzing these things are the relationships between the workers and employers; some pimps look after there workers and provide fair compensation, others go to impoverished 3rd world countries, go to the villages with suitcases of money and buy women for 500 dollars a person paid to the family and come back every year, then keep them as slaves.
Ubereats and other associated apps all pay people below min wage and rely on a similar model of importing slavery to the 1st world; they are essentially sanatized servant apps.
What's your objection to OnlyFans? I mean, apart from objection we can make to anything under capitalism.
It's safer and more lucrative than most sex work. I know a lot of people who've switched from other kinds of sex work to Only Fans.
OnlyFans is the pimp. They take a cut out of earnings and yeah, that makes them pimps.
Most "creators" (that's what the platform calls them) make 10 bucks a year. Only a few ever make enough money to live on it. It's like that on most of these platforms, we see the top creators but most people toil forever without seeing any revenue.
The high-end, top earning "creators" are also no different from petty bourgeois earners. Those don't want onlyfans or our attitude to porn to change bc their entire livelihood is based on the revenue they make there. To which I say, welp, tough luck when the revolution comes. The brick and mortar petty bourgeois will see his store seized and so will the onlyfans account.
Creators also make custom content (maybe not all of them do idk) for clients. They become prostitutes by proxy of a phone screen, but still prostitutes.
The screen proxy kind of obfuscates the nature of onlyfans but it's still prostitution, albeit perhaps a bit safer because it happens on the internet.
We've seen also with the Amouranth situation (though I only heard about it when it came out, idk what came of it) that some "creators" are trafficked into doing this. I assume there are many, many more trafficked "models" on onlyfans than the platform lets on.
A lot of Instagram 'models' or whatever are escorting on the side, using their social media to promote their work.
I actually looked that up for this comment, but not for Instagram specifically, and it seems most were escorrs/prostitutes before doing it on social. However it seems they also switch to OF if they can make enough money on it and ditch the escorts once that happens.
This isn't emphasized nearly enough. Again, when people talk about sex work they gotta be more clear about who they're talking about.
We gotta make the distinction between sex workers and sex bourgeoisie in these conversations because mainstream liberal society just casually lumps the latter into some big tent where both the views of the pimp and their sex-slave are held on equal footing.
Like I said in another comment here, there are some grey areas that add nuance to the discussions around this, but when it comes to who is exploiting and who is being exploited -- that part is pretty damn clear.
What percentage of OnlyFans models receive 100% of their profit?
Sex trafficker and rapist Andrew Tate forced his victims to perform on his OnlyFans. How many similar stories are there? Is OnlyFans really a crowdsourcing platform for self-employed sex workers, or is it a pimp's paradise hiding behind the facade of the former?
I found a Google AMP link in your comment! I've removed Google's spyware for you! :3
The way i see it OnlyFans is basically crowdfunding for porn, predating on lonely people. OnlyFans creators are hustling lonely people out of their money, and the platform encourages them to do it by taking a cut.
Personally I dont have an objection with OnlyFans in concept or execution, aside from it doing that predatory youtube thing where it sells an idea of material abundance that is only actually avilable to 0.01% of users on the app; most onlyfans creators (90%+) make less than 700 dollars a month.
Its the same issue with the music industry, it only rewards a tiny few people and gives scraps to the rest while selling a false idea of social mobility and monetary abundance.
Basically onlyfans needs to unionize