▲ 520 ▼ How I (US) make tea when my British friend comes over to visit (feddit.uk) submitted 2 years ago by Blackout@feddit.uk to c/casualuk@feddit.uk 181 comments fedilink hide all child comments Correct me if I got anything wrong, TA!
[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (3 children) Milk only belongs in chai tea permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children) Chai literally means tea. So chai tea is tea tea. It's like pizza pie or ATM machine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] smeg@feddit.uk 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) The Americans seem to have a very wide definition of the word Pie and none of them seem to be pies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Threeme2189@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago It's the same with brits and the word pudding... permalink fedilink source parent [–] QueriesQueried@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yes and but that's just how the distinction is made. Prime example: Shiba/Akita "Inu". Inu is literally dog. Yet it refers to the purebred dog of Japan, not the american shitmix (no shade, theres just not much consistency with what they're mixed with). Language evolves over time, even the dumb evolutions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tvkan@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago I don't think they're engaging in etymological reductionism. Their argument is that instead of saying "milk only belongs in chai tea", one could've just said "milk only belongs in chai". permalink fedilink source parent [–] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago Chia .... tea. Chia .... tea. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago What about boba? Although I guess that's arguably tea in milk, rather than milk in tea. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children) Chai literally means tea. So chai tea is tea tea. It's like pizza pie or ATM machine. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] smeg@feddit.uk 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) The Americans seem to have a very wide definition of the word Pie and none of them seem to be pies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Threeme2189@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago It's the same with brits and the word pudding... permalink fedilink source parent [–] QueriesQueried@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yes and but that's just how the distinction is made. Prime example: Shiba/Akita "Inu". Inu is literally dog. Yet it refers to the purebred dog of Japan, not the american shitmix (no shade, theres just not much consistency with what they're mixed with). Language evolves over time, even the dumb evolutions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tvkan@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago I don't think they're engaging in etymological reductionism. Their argument is that instead of saying "milk only belongs in chai tea", one could've just said "milk only belongs in chai". permalink fedilink source parent
[+] smeg@feddit.uk 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) The Americans seem to have a very wide definition of the word Pie and none of them seem to be pies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Threeme2189@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago It's the same with brits and the word pudding... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) The Americans seem to have a very wide definition of the word Pie and none of them seem to be pies. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Threeme2189@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago It's the same with brits and the word pudding... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Threeme2189@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago It's the same with brits and the word pudding... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QueriesQueried@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Yes and but that's just how the distinction is made. Prime example: Shiba/Akita "Inu". Inu is literally dog. Yet it refers to the purebred dog of Japan, not the american shitmix (no shade, theres just not much consistency with what they're mixed with). Language evolves over time, even the dumb evolutions. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Tvkan@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago I don't think they're engaging in etymological reductionism. Their argument is that instead of saying "milk only belongs in chai tea", one could've just said "milk only belongs in chai". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tvkan@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago I don't think they're engaging in etymological reductionism. Their argument is that instead of saying "milk only belongs in chai tea", one could've just said "milk only belongs in chai". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago Chia .... tea. Chia .... tea. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago What about boba? Although I guess that's arguably tea in milk, rather than milk in tea. permalink fedilink source parent