World News

2307 readers

86 users here now

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

248

Priorities (lemmygrad.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

307 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe, but there's not much value in fighting over definitions. De facto, they have not annexed anything.

This is nonsense. You're attempting to redefine what annexation is to suit your argument.

Oh, are countries not allowed to sail ships through international waters now? Is the US annexing these territories when it does the same thing?

China themselves claim that their boats are patrolling their own territorial waters when sailing in these areas. The US and Canada and others claim they are sailing in international waters under international maritime law, or with the permission of the nations whose water they are sailing through.

But the big difference is that the US isn't making a claim to any territory. China is, and then they're attempting to assert that claim with their navy. That is clearly annexation.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You’re attempting to redefine what annexation is to suit your argument.

Fair enough, I did not phrase the above point correctly. I have edited the comment accordingly.

That is clearly annexation.

Since you keep using this word, I guess I'll bite a bit longer in fighting over definitions...

Courtesy of Merriam-Webster, annexation is incorporating "(an additional geographic area) within the domain of a country, state, etc." I don't think it's self-evident that just sailing a ship by some islands is "clearly annexation"

In any case, it's not really important whether it counts as "annexation" or not. What difference does it make if China makes this claim if there's nobody there to enforce it?